On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:37:02 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil>
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:54:59 GMT, * <nospam@plz.com> wrote:

} Questions LOCKHEED/NASA  Avoids and Refuses to Answer:
} 

Can you provide documentation that you've asked this of them directly,
or were you expecting them to read the newsgroup?

I have never received an answer to these questions and I've asked
repeatedly. But rather than taking my word for it, I recommend anyone
interested who would like to attempt to encourage NASA to answer these
questions to write, phone NASA directly and see for themselves.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
Washington DC 20546-0001 
(202) 358-0000 

Questions LOCKHEED/NASA  Avoids and Refuses to Answer:

1.  Name one independent scientist not employed by or under contract by NASA
who has been invited by NASA to scientifically peer review Malins' raw Mars
photographic data.

2.  Why if NASA is operating under the auspices of a
government agency  and their data belongs to the United States government is
Dr. Malin allowed to claim ownership of the raw Mars photographic data?

3.  Why doesn't the space shuttle say "property of the US Government"?

4.  Why does President Bush dictating to NASA what they can and can not do.
Name the laws which give the President power over NASA.

5.  Is NASA a government agency or a private agency?

6.  If NASA is a private agency under the auspices of Lockheed, then given
George Bush senior is advisor to Carlyle Industries which own controlling
interest in Lockeed, how can NASA avoid being in conflict of interest
with the US government which is allegedly funding space missions.

7.  Given the above, if NASA is now a privately independently owned
government agency, is going to Mars a special interest project?