Re:


wrote in message news:...
| From: M�RD����� r�ff�lf�l�hW �hT  <nospam@newsranger.com>
| Subject: Proof of military/newspaper/intelligence serivce COVER-UP of
ETs/UFO's!
| Lines: 118
| Message-ID: <qFjTb.1572$_4.152@www.newsranger.com>
| X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
| X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
| X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
| X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
| NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:41:10 EST
| Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
| Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:41:10 GMT
| Xref: pd7hu0no alt.alien.visitors:12600 alt.alien.research:8688
alt.paranet.ufo:30128958 alt.paranet.abduct:30019727
| X-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:41:49 MST (pd7tw1no)
|
| Giant Triangle-Multiple Witness Story - From: Greg Boone
<Evolbaby@aol.com>
|
| This story is proof positive of the UFO coverup by news sources.
|
| On August 25th 1985 I along with 10 other newsmen were on duty at the
| Poughkeepsie Journal, New York's oldest newspaper and one of the flagships
of
| the Gannett News Service.
|
| It was about 9:35 pm when one of our photogs radioed in that one of those
giant
| boomerang UFOs, that people had been reporting for years, was heading
south on
| Route 9.
|
| Mind you, on this day it was during the Dutchess County Fair, one of the
oldest
| and biggest county fairs in the U.S. Roughly 20,000 people leaving the
fair's
| festivities for home, were travelling that highway heading south from
Rhinebeck,
| NY about 18 miles north of Poughkeepsie. (Poughkeepsie is about 75 miles
north
| of NY City).
|
| Our photog stated that the craft was huge and headed south and it might be
| visible from our office windows which are on the 3rd floor. I and two
editors
| dashed to the northern window of the managing editor's office and sure
enough at
| a distance of approximately 5 miles we saw a dark shape about 100ft above
the
| ground with amber and red lights slowly growing bigger as it headed our
way.
|
| It was big, slow moving and in no way was supposed to be flying over
residential
| areas. Folks up there have shotguns and use em' at the drop of a hat! Very
old
| republican territory. Folks still beef about Pearl Harbor like it was
yesterday.
|
| On the highway, thousands and thousands of people were so alarmed they
bolted
| from their cars to gander at this craft.
|
| Of the ten editors/reporters there I believe only 3 were non-ex military.
I
| stood there and watched as the craft suddenly got within a couple miles
and shut
| off its lights, aft to fore, pivoted yo port, traveled east a bit, then,
| startingly, a hard starboard turn heading straight for us!
|
| This thing got huge and believe it or not flew right over top of us at
about 40
| ft.  It had to be 200ft wide and was jet black. The illumination of the
street
| lights not reflecting anything off its surface that we could determine.
|
| Wanting to get a better glimpse of it, we dashed to the other windows to
see if
| it had passed overhead. Couldn't be seen and we realized it might be
hovering
| over us. Sure enoug
|
| h that's what it did!
|
| We dashed to one of the bathrooms facing East and that's when the craft
turned
| East again and glided over the more heavily populated section of the city,
| noiselessly and was gone.
|
| Mind you, tens of thousands saw this as clear as a bell. Veteran military
and
| veteran news and veteran law enforcement as well.
|
| I immediately thought of Stan Friedman, as he had lectured on UFOs at
Dutchess
| Community College several years earlier, and we ran a kind story about it.
(Yes
| Stan, I was leaning over the city desk making sure it got in kindly :)
|
| Well, we're sitting there screaming at the photogs and reporters that this
will
| be the story of the century. We had access to AP, Gannett etc. and USA
Today
| which we mainly put out.
|
| Nope. Word came down from on high that not one word was to be mentioned.
Solid
| object, hovered, maneuvered seen by tens of thousands, pictures taken, and
no
| mention anywhere.
|
| Next day some 'menacing' chaps showed up in our editorial office. I got in
| trouble for staring back just as menacingly.  That night, at the local
watering
| hole where I would sit and do sketches after work, another big menacing
fellow
| waltzes in with a stack of papers and pics 8 inches high. Slams them on
the bar
| and bellows a threat:
|
| "So! Somebody in here wanted to talk about UFOs?"
|
| He made a big mistake. My high school and college chums were at the bar
that
| night and we are just as big and menacing. He was ceremoniously ushered
out of
| the bar by about 3,000 pounds of very angry citizens.
|
| This was the first time that craft flew over our newspaper but wasn't the
last.
|
| A year later, a huge saucer shaped craft did the same thing.  We all
bolted
| outside this time on the roof of the building and saw a circle of lights,
about
| a half-mile wide, hovering over a local monument that rests on a hill that
| couples go to pitch woo.
|
| It was there for about 10 minutes and cops, people all saw it.
|
| Then the remarkable part. As I dashed downstairs to get my trusty
telescope from
| my van to get a closer look, I suddenly looked straight up and another
large
| boomerang object was directly overhead!
|
| Three people were in the parking lot at that time with me and we stared at
it
| and then it kicked in orange afterburners - I recall six, laterally, on
it's aft
| section - and took off like a rocket, due-West, at high speed and then did
a
| hard bank to port that suprised us and must've taken off SW at over 500
mph,
| easily. You could hear the afterburners kick in overhead and this thing at
about
| 100ft high was about 100ft wide.
|
| It wasn't the source of the circular lights, but we suspect the boomerang
| shaped-object chased away the circular object.
|
| That's two UFOs in one - at night, close up - again multiple witnesses.
|
| I've seen these craft about 6 times - and way back, in 1980, a friend got
pics
| of it. The first time I'd heard of it and we developed the film at the
newspaper
| ourselves. Nothing unusual but definitely the boomerang-shape. We figured
just
| another test aircraft that that region is famous for testing.
|
| Yet again. Mum was the word and there was heck to pay if you pressed the
issue
| at the evening editor's meeting.
|
| Best,
|
| Greg
There are a few things that bother me about the above. If there are alien
aircrafts in our skies and so
many witnesses it is obvious that they WANT to be seen. As to why people are
intimidated in not
talking about or reporting these sightings is another problem. WHAT
knowledge do those who intimidate
possess and why are they attempting to keep citizens in the dark??? Surely
they cannot use 'protecting'
the public as an excuse. Most people like myself resent the governments
'parental ' attitude when it comes to what knowledge we should or should not
have access to. If they expect us to believe that man
has landed on the moon, and sent probes to other planets like mars......how
do they expect us to not believe that there might even BE other forms of
life or even aliens probing  OUR  planet???????
Whenever there are coverups and secrecy it makes people even MORE suspicious
of the motives of those who are doing it even if the motives are well
intentioned.