| Subject: Re: You Don't Have To 'Believe' In UFOs Any Longer |
| From: David Patrick |
| Date: 13/02/2004, 14:32 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:57:01 GMT, MÜRDñüñøÇ r郃ålƒéløhW éhT
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <00al20lsbtj5355c8q4scvrqgkatbip2g3@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:36:29 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
Å.S.Å. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
You Don't Have To 'Believe' In UFOs Any Longer By James Neff
<webmaster@sightings.com> 5/28/00
Whenever I hear the question "do you believe in UFOs?" there often arises an
instant feeling of frustration which quickly rolls over into fatigue and a sense
of pity.
This post again, Flaffer?
If you agree with this guy, then why not at least name the case you
think best proves alien contact. I'll not ask you to justify that
decision, as that seems to be beyond you.
But just name your best case for alien contact. You can manage that,
can't you?
God DARN you Patty. If you disrupting this group with the
other truth-terrorists, you will be defined as a
enemy combatant! And off Kamp X-Ray with you
and your Cult of Useful Iditos!! And not a moment too soon!
That would be a 'no', then.
How on Earth can you ever expect scientific discussion of cases if you
refuse to ever present any evidence of your own. All you ever do is
cut-n-paste other people's work and then refuse to give any response
other than moronic abuse.
David Patrick