Subject: Re: Wal-Mart, Others Driving Down Working Conditions Worldwide
From: Sir Other
Date: 14/02/2004, 19:16
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

In article <c0arn3$2gni$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, MichaelP says...

http://www.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/51528 Yahoo! News   Tue, Feb 
10, 2004

World - OneWorld.net

Wal-Mart, Other Big Retailers Driving Down Working Conditions Worldwide 

OneWorld.net

Jim Lobe, OneWorld US

WASHINGTON, D.C., Feb 10 (OneWorld) --Wal-Mart and other major global 
retailers in the apparel and food industries are driving down working 
conditions for millions of mostly women workers worldwide, according to a 
new report by the British-based international development agency, Oxfam.

Despite the retailers' claims that they demand that their contractors 
comply with basic labor standards, their demands for ever-quicker and 
cheaper goods are making compliance impossible in many cases, according to 
the report, "Trading Away Our Rights."

"This is where globalization is failing in its potential to lift people 
out of poverty and support development," said the director of Oxfam's 
"Make Trade Fair" campaign. "There is a widening gap between the rhetoric 
of global corporate social responsibility and the reality of the corporate 
business model."

"Many corporations have codes of conduct to hold their suppliers 
accountable for labor standards, but their own ruthless buying strategies 
often make it impossible for these standards to be met," he added.

The new report, which is based on hundreds of interviews of workers, 
factor, and farm owners, global brands, importers, exporters, and union 
and government officials in 12 countries, comes amid growing efforts by 
multinational corporations to reassure their consumers that workers who 
produce their goods are able to earn a decent living.

But a spate of recent newspaper articles and studies have suggested that 
these efforts may be undermined by growing competitive pressures created 
by the demands of retailers and the ever-growing number of poor countries 
that have heeded advice and pressure from international financial 
institutions (IFIs) to open their economies to attract investment and 
jobs.

"Globalization has hugely strengthened the negotiating hand of retailers 
and brand companies," according to the report. "New technologies, trade 
liberalization, and capital mobility have dramatically opened up the 
number of countries and producers from which they can source products, 
creating a growing number of producers vying for a place in their supply 
chains."

Wal-Mart, the world's biggest retailer, has led the field in putting this 
model into practice, the report said. It is currently buying products from 
some 65,000 suppliers worldwide and selling to over 138 million consumers 
each week through its 1,300 stores in 10 countries.

It has made China, where wages are far lower than anywhere else in Asia 
and workers are denied the opportunity to form independent unions, the 
center of production, a key point made in feature article that appeared in 
the Washington Post Sunday.

"As capital scours the globe for cheaper and more malleable workers, and 
as poor countries seek multinational companies to provide jobs, lift 
production and open export markets," the Post said, "Wal-Mart and China 
have forged themselves into the ultimate joint venture, their symbiosis 
influencing the terms of labor and consumption the world over."

That marriage, however, according to the both the Post account and the 
Oxfam report, has come largely at the expense of the worker on the factory 
line. "Wal-Mart pressures the factory to cut its price, and the factory 
responds with longer hours or lower pay," a Chinese labor official who 
declined to be identified for fear of retaliation told the Post, "And the 
workers have no options."

That was also the message of a report released Monday by the New 
York-based National Labor Committee and China Labor Watch on a toy factory 
in Ping Township in Guangdong province that produces goods for Wal-Mart. 
The two groups reported that the mostly female labor force at the plant 
were paid only about half the legal minimum wage and forced to work longer 
hours than the legal maximum. It also reported that fire exits were 
normally locked.

Wal-Mart responded to the report by insisting that it conducted regular 
inspections of all of its plants in China, but the groups said that plant 
managers were always informed of the inspections in advance and coached 
the workers on what to tell the inspectors.

The report was largely consistent with the findings of the Oxfam study 
that put the main responsibility for the worsening situation on corporate 
buying teams that pressure suppliers to deliver "just-in-time" orders at 
ever-lower prices in hopes of squeezing maximum profit from goods once 
they are sold to shoppers in mainly wealthy countries.

"Today's business ethos is 'make it quick, make it flexible, make it 
cheap,'" said Blomer. "Anyone appalled by labor conditions in the world 
today should be asking, 'so who turned up the heat?' The workers at the 
bottom of the global supply chains are helping to fuel national export 
growth and shareholders' returns, but their jobs are being made vere more 
insecure, unhealthy and exhausting and their rights weakened."

To minimize resistance, contractors are employing workers who are less 
likely to try to join trade unions in those countries where they exist. 
For the most part, these include young women, often migrants or 
immigrants, who are easily intimidated if they do not cooperate with 
management.

"Jobs in labor-intensive industries are celebrated as empowering women,"  
according to Bloomer. "While we welcom the fact that millions of women are
getting a wage, the wage alone doesn't free them from poverty. Instead,
they're being burnt out by working harder, faster, over longer hours and
with few health, maternity or union rights. It's a poor strategy for
improving women's lives," he added, noting that the IFIs, such as the
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) were complicit in the
worsening situation by encouraging governments to make their labor markets
ever more "flexible."

In Chile, for example, 75 percent of women in the agricultural sector are 
hired on temporary contracts picking fruit and put in more than 60 hours a 
week during the season, but one third still make below minimum wage.

Fewer than half the women in Bangladesh garment factories have a contract, 
and the majority receive no maternity or health benefits. Some 80 percent 
fear dismissal if they complain.

In China's Guangdong province, young women face 150 hours of overtime each 
month in the garment factors, but only 40 percent have a written contract 
and 90 percent have no access to social insurance.

Given these kinds of situations, governments must step in to guarantee 
workers basic labor rights, including the right to join trade unions and 
bargain collectively. At the same time, a greater effort must be made to 
enforce labor laws, while consumers must insist that retailers do a far 
better job of monitoring labor conditions to ensure that the employment 
they are creating in poor countries is not exploitative, according to the 
report.