| Subject: Re: URGENT: 9-11 Cellphone Stories Were Lies! |
| From: Patty Brooks |
| Date: 22/02/2004, 15:14 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.conspiracy |
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:02:46 GMT, an asshole named Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers Å.S.Å. <nospam@newsranger.com>, wrote:
The only difference is I deal with REAL facts, not made-up ones.
Your "guessing" is what most guesses end up being: WRONG
The experiment is a total wash... It wasn't even designed around the
SAME environment of the tragedy. It's very evident the scientific
principle was not used in any of the conditions.
What was your control group?
How many times did you run the tests?
Was it done the same time of year?
How about sunspot and solar activity?
What models of cell phones (sat phones?) were used, and what was the
physical location of the people using them in relations to the
aircraft?
How new are the cell towers used in the experiment, as compared to the
ones in DC/PA/DC?
What was the background noise of the phone calls like?
Does the 911 agency have the tape available for signal analysis?
So put your carcass on a similar jet that is landing in NY, PA or in
DC and try your phone out.
Unless you do that you're sticking your head in the sand and accepting
lies from people. TEST EVERYTHING.
URGENT: 9-11 Cellphone Stories Were Lies!
September 1, 2003
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
Repeating a lie does not make it the truth.