| Subject: Re: URGENT: Easter Bunnie Stories Are Lies! |
| From: Shaun Howell |
| Date: 22/02/2004, 16:32 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.conspiracy |
in article pm7h305ko34o3c2fjcrkmt7ohpp6fjfhn4@4ax.com, Patty Brooks at
iinvestig84u@yahoo.com wrote on 2/22/04 9:14 AM:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:02:46 GMT, an asshole named Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers Å.S.Å. <nospam@newsranger.com>, wrote:
The only difference is I deal with REAL facts, not made-up ones.
Your "guessing" is what most guesses end up being: WRONG
The experiment is a total wash... It wasn't even designed around the
SAME environment of the tragedy. It's very evident the scientific
principle was not used in any of the conditions.
What was your control group?
How many times did you run the tests?
Was it done the same time of year?
How about sunspot and solar activity?
Wow, you forgot to ask him if he was full of crap...