On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:33:20 GMT, "Rick Sobie"
<ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> wrote:

} While you are soaking in your vat Carl, here is a little light reading for you.

Geez, this outta be good.

} The Hollow Moon
} 
} "A theory that suggests that the moon is a large hollow sphere...originated during
} seismological tests on the moon following the Lunar landings.
} 
} This occured most notably in November 1969 after seismometers were set up on the
} moons surface by the astronauts of Apollo XII. When the Lunar module had taken off,
} heading back to earth the astronauts discarded the ascent stage of the lunar module,
} dropping it on the moons surface, smashing the craft and creating a tremor that was
} picked up by the seismometers and when the NASA scientists heard the data stream,
} they couldn't believe what they were hearing. The moon was ringing like a bell and
} continued to do so for around an hour.
} 
} After they had had a chance to analyse the seismological information, NASA declared
} that the moon seemed to be a hollow sphere with a metallic layer around 34-40 metres
} deep."

Well, see? Now we can prove the "faked Apollo flights" people wrong.
We have proof the moon is hollow based on equipment put there by the
astronauts.

} http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/articlehollowmoon.shtml

In order for the moon to have the mass it does and be a shell only
34-40 meters thick, it would have to be made out of neutronium. It
obviously isn't.

The seismometer experiments from Apollo actually proved the moon was
nearly homogenous inside, rather than layers of materials like the
Earth.