Patty Brooks <iinvestig84u@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:02:46 GMT, an asshole named Sir
Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers Å.S.Å. 
<nospam@newsranger.com>, wrote: 

The only difference is I deal with REAL facts, not made-up
ones. Your "guessing" is what most guesses end up being:
WRONG 

The experiment is a total wash... It wasn't even designed
around the SAME environment of the tragedy. It's very
evident the scientific principle was not used in any of the
conditions. 

What was your control group? 

How many times did you run the tests? 

Was it done the same time of year? 

How about sunspot and solar activity? 

What models of cell phones (sat phones?) were used, and
what was the physical location of the people using them in
relations to the aircraft? 

How new are the cell towers used in the experiment, as
compared to the ones in DC/PA/DC? 

 What was the background noise of the phone calls like? 

Does the 911 agency have the tape available for signal
analysis? 

So put your carcass on a similar jet that is landing in NY,
PA or in DC and try your phone out.

That's sorta what he did, but he did it in Holeflapper 
Fantasyland, where everything is, euphemistically speaking, 
"different."  
 

Unless you do that you're sticking your head in the sand
and accepting lies from people. TEST EVERYTHING.

URGENT: 9-11 Cellphone Stories Were Lies!
September 1, 2003
Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Repeating a lie does not make it the truth.