| Subject: Re: What level of PROOF is adequate proof//EXPLAINED AGAIN! |
| From: "tim gueguen" <tgueguen@shaw.ca> |
| Date: 24/02/2004, 21:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic |
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:PLC_b.83217$Po1.47361@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
tim gueguen wrote:
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers �.S.�." <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote
in
message news:pe1_b.4018$_4.157@www.newsranger.com...
and the eye-witness testimony from people all over the world,
Which is the weakest form of evidence without other corroboration.
Careful. I might quote you on that.
Note the term "without other corroboration." There's lots of corroboration
that the Nazis systematically murdered millions during WW2. You know that,
despite your silly claims to the contrary.
tim gueguen 101867