| Subject: Re: The Hollow Moon |
| From: "Rick Sobie" <ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> |
| Date: 25/02/2004, 07:45 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.fan.art-bell |
"Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote in message
news:0mvn30t7ma8371m00bi0u0as1bhmm34nh9@4ax.com...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:54:42 GMT, "Rick Sobie"
<ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> wrote:
If it were 5 miles thick, it would have to be so dense that it massed
the equivalent of 1086 mile radius of solid rock. It would have to be
over 200 times denser than basalt. There is nothing like that.
If there were, and you built a sphere out of it, it would collapse.
4 or 5 miles of dirt and rock, and several miles of solid titanium alloy.
This would be a god opportunity for some genius to do the math.
How thick would the titanium need to be, to withstand an impact,
which resulted in a crater 2,200 km in diameter, and an average of 10km
deep, keeping in mind that 4 or 5 iles of that depth, would be the dirt
layer, and the reaminder, titanium alloy, resulting in an internal dent of about
1 mile.
From Wikipedia: "Geophysicists expert in impact dynamics are convinced
that a normal impact could not have produced the basin without digging
up vast amounts of mantle materials, but observations thus far have
been highly inconclusive about whether there is any mantle material
present at all. This suggests that the basin was not formed by a
typical high-velocity impact, but may instead have been formed by a
low-velocity projectile that hit at a low angle (about 30 degrees or
less), and hence did not dig very deeply into the Moon. Such a
glancing impact would have sent much of the resulting debris back into
space surrounding the Moon and Earth, which may have provided a source
of projectiles to make other lunar basins, many of which may have been
made in a narrow time interval between 3.85 and 3.95 billion years
ago."
This glancing blow can be seen in Ica stones of Peru, and that is a possible theory,
still if someone is good at math, and engineering perhaps they could calculate
the question I posed above wrt the necessary thickness needed to withstand
the impact, and result in a dent 1 mile high in the interior.
Since no mantle material is present, this is even more curious, but what
IS the composition then of the center of the Aitken Basin? Is it titanium rich
material?
And speaking of Wikipedia, you might look up Dyson Sphere,
and you will find the signature of a Dyson Sphere is consistent,
with the infrared signature as shown in this Naval Space Command link
from the Clementine images of Tycho crater, where the hull was exposed
by what looks like two projectiles as can be seen in the large tif
file, left image center of crater, when you zoom in.
Here is the Dyson Sphere link... (A metal phere containing a dwarf star.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
Here is the image showing the infrared signature.
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/clem_collect/tycho.html
Here is a closeup hi res image showing the unusual polygon/pentagon structure.
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/select_img/hires.html
And here is the center of Tycho crater showing what appears to be,
the exposed titanium alloy hull, with 2 embedded projectiles.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rsobie/TheTimelineofEvents_files/image040.jpg
And finally here is the Ica stone link, showing the glancing blow to Aitken
Basin
http://www.labyrinthina.com/ica.htm (scroll down middle of page)
Also, seeing as how the center of gravioty is several kilometers closer to
the earth side, and the thickest part of the crust is on the opposite
side would not it wobble?
And also, since they have determined that at the very center, there appears to be
a small core, could that not be the contained star of the Dyson Sphere?
And what about frame dragging? Would that not cause the moon to spin
on the moons planetary axis, that being around a line through the middle
from north to south. And what about the fact that it affects the tides,
applying a force on the earth as it rotates, and should there not be an equal
and opposite force resulting again in the moon spinning around its planetary axis?
(I am not referring to its 28 rotational spin, wrt the sun, from some viewpoint
above the earth moon sun frame of reference. The question as to whether or
not there is a dark side of the moon is not being raised at all)