Subject: Re: What level of PROOF is adequate proof//EXPLAINED AGAIN!
From: "tim gueguen" <tgueguen@shaw.ca>
Date: 25/02/2004, 19:58
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic

"Matt Giwer" <matt@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.56.0402250716270.4840@localhost.localdomain...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, tim gueguen wrote:


"Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:PLC_b.83217$Po1.47361@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
tim gueguen wrote:
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers �.S.�." <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote
in
message news:pe1_b.4018$_4.157@www.newsranger.com...

and the eye-witness testimony from people all over the world,

Which is the weakest form of evidence without other corroboration.

Careful. I might quote you on that.

Note the term "without other corroboration."  There's lots of
corroboration
that the Nazis systematically murdered millions during WW2.  You know
that,
despite your silly claims to the contrary.

Additional stories are not corroboration as you well know. Were that
the case blood Matzahs would be established. Physical evidence as always.

Which there is.  As I said, you know this, despite your claims to the
contrary.

tim gueguen 101867