| Subject: Re: The Hollow Moon |
| From: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> |
| Date: 26/02/2004, 03:30 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:29:52 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar
<targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:45:38 GMT, "Rick Sobie"
<ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> wrote:
}
} "Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote in message
} news:0mvn30t7ma8371m00bi0u0as1bhmm34nh9@4ax.com...
} > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:54:42 GMT, "Rick Sobie"
} > <ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> wrote:
} > If it were 5 miles thick, it would have to be so dense that it massed
} > the equivalent of 1086 mile radius of solid rock. It would have to be
} > over 200 times denser than basalt. There is nothing like that.
} >
} > If there were, and you built a sphere out of it, it would collapse.
}
} 4 or 5 miles of dirt and rock, and several miles of solid titanium alloy.
5 miles of rock and 5 miles of titanium would still require something
else that was 99% the mass of the moon.
Please do not feed the faux Sobie-Troll. Thank you.
--
V.G.
"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass
rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker
(This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.