"Rick Sobie" <ricksobie@spamnotshaw.ca> wrote in message news:<n_B%b.623967$X%5.32164@pd7tw2no>...

"Chris Saunders CSGD" <csgd01@SPAMoptusnetFRREEPLEASE.com.au> wrote in message
news:403ea73d$0$4260$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

"*" <nospam@plz.com> wrote in message
news:4g7t30lnhpmqumf2ahadvcn3s4lm5sbv9u@4ax.com...

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:05:11 -0700, "Jay Windley" <webmaster@clavius.org>
wrote:

Nothing from NASA says the moon is hollow.  Get over it.

The moon would have a horrid time staying in a consistent orbit around the
earth and sun if it was hollow.

It would also have a horrid time exerting the very precisely calculated
gravity that it has; you know, the one that creates tides and stops
moon-walking astronauts tumbling away towards Alpha Centauri?

I can't believe people would entertain this gobbledeegook.

And I can't believe that you do not understand physics, where if a moon
is applying a force on the earth and dragging the tides, as the moon rotates,
then an equal force should be applied to the moon, making it spin on its
planetary axis. But it does not, and hence, no magnetosphere. And hence
you are full of beans.

Earthling.

Um, are you saying "Physics" as in "classical physics" or as in "Rick
Sobies Physics"?

If you say it is the first, please post your calculations reinforcing
your position.

O'