"oh_brother" <oh_brutha2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message >

Um, are you saying "Physics" as in "classical physics" or as in "Rick
Sobies Physics"?

If you say it is the first, please post your calculations reinforcing
your position.

Firstly, if people do not understand Newtonian physics, f=ma,
then I don't suppose they are going to understand Einstein's field equasions either,
and if you can't understand that, there is not much hope you could
understand mine.

But let us suppose, that you understand about frame dragging, seeing as how
this is a science newsgroup, and let us suppose also, that you heard somewhere
that man made satellites exhibit frame dragging, have you thought about what
affect frame dragging might have on the moon?

Have you considered that the center of gravity of the moon is not in the center
of the moon, but is off by several kilometers? And have you considered there
are no masscons on earth? Have you seen any planes dip when going over
any old craters on earth? Like Apollo missions did passing over the marias?

Just because someone applies a name to a thing, you automatically assume
that it must be understood and factual. Masscons, and tidal locking,
are nice sounding phrases based on no scientific principals other than,
"well folks, that is what we observe, and we don't know why it does that,
but lets call it this."

And then go on to look for any explanation that people will accept,
and if they really push us on the weak points of our arguments,
then just persist and pretend they just don't understand, and if that
fails appeal to authority.

It is a circular game that leads nowhere.

And I want my ship back. As stated I am offering a $500 dollar reward
no questions asked for its safe return.
It looks sortof like this
http://cosmicparadigm.com/images/MeierUFO.gif