| Subject: Re: Debunking Roswell Debunkers |
| From: John Griffin |
| Date: 05/03/2004, 14:17 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.astro,sci.skeptic |
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers �.S.�.
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
Debunking Roswell debunkers by Stanton Friedman
BIG failure.
Shortly after finishing my MUFON 2003 paper "Critiquing the
Roswell Critics" for the Conference Proceedings, I was
alerted to two more widely distributed Roswell debunking
articles in major publications. Each had the word ROSWELL
on the covers in large print, the better to sell the
magazines. Often I am told that the Roswell International
UFO Museum and Research Center and people like me are only
in the Roswell business to make money. We don't count
research costs, of course, or the fact that admission to
the museum is free. But it is OK for magazines to hype
Roswell to sell magazines.
Who is this dumb asshole who thinks that would even be a
question?! Obviously publishers have as much right to do that
as this idiot has to hype Roswell to make himself look like a
fuckin' clown.
The 1997 issue of Time Magazine
with a goofy looking female on the cover (like no
alien anybody had ever reported)
Who the fuck is this dumb asshole, thinking he's the only one
who can make up "reports" of what aliens look like?!
yap yap yap yap yap