| Subject: Re: Spirit Photographs |
| From: Your Name Here=Harvey |
| Date: 29/04/2004, 04:01 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo |
While a nice website with nice photographs/stills.
The question must become - are your 'rods' the same as in the television
program 'rods!'.
I can only presume that 'yours' are much smaller than in the television
program, a whole lot smaller?
Question: Are the insects you are capturing on tape, a rod shape? In it's
entirety? Or is it being captured 4 or so times, in which the one insect
is being re-exposed successively, thereby giving the appearance of a 'rod'
shape? Due to the camera doing that...?
You cannot immediately go ahead and say that because you captured rod-like
images, which are insects, therefore any other rod captured on film is also
the same, therefore not an alien lifeform, etc.
If you can produce identical images as from that television program or
website etc, where you're capturing insect life forms on videotape/camera -
then your claims would be correct. But if they are different (different
size as to being much much smaller) and not travelling as fast across the
field of view - then they are different.
The so-called 'rods' are large (6 inches and larger) compared to insects,
and move very very fast - if yours don't move that fast across the field
of view - then they don't appear to be the same.
However you could make the case, that if you're at the right magnification or
close to them, you can make it appear that they move that fast, by very
careful photographing/videoing at an exact distance/etc.
But this is not in keeping with the case for the 'rods' - the various
people in the program were looking at large 'rods', and nothing so very
small.
I'm all for the truth, and nothing but the truth, and not something which
just might pass for it, under certain conditions.
I think everyone is familar with dust particles in sunlight, and insects,
too under the same conditions.
Harvey
In article <i4mdnXbCzoTcCBLdRVn-ig@comcast.com>, dalecusterjr@comcast.net
says...
Rods, Orbs, etc., are fake. They are insects or dust particles. Ever
wonder why you haven't seen them in person, well, you have. They fly around
you all the time.
http://home.flash.net/~storyink/hotrods/hotrods.htm
Dale - who is willing to allow facts the attention they deserve.
"Your Name Here=Harvey" <you@somewhere.not.aus> wrote in message
news:4uGjc.51$s3.2391@news02.tsnz.net...
In article <408f29e9$0$73086$a0465688@nnrp.fuse.net>, anon@nospam.com
says...
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030008060309050309020007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:
In article <W6-dnan8DdnlKxPdRVn-vA@comcast.com>,
dalecusterjr@comcast.net
says...
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C42C6D.90390590
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought that rods were insects?!? you mean it's TRUE!?!
A lot of things in the universe are true - but mankind remains
ignorant of them. Rods is probably the first of these 'unexplained'
phenomena that has the best chance of being the first - to be accepted,
and scientifically proven to exist - via videography/photography,
the others will slowly be accepted, given time?
Harvey
Does *anyone* follow the helpful and informative links I supply?
Listen slowly... the ghost photos were *fake*, the rod photos were
*fake*. Please do your own internet searching from now on. BTW - those
links in my previous replies took a total of 5 minutes to find on yahoo.
It ain't rocket science Gumby.
--
Chris Mork
Owner CCG Sales / Small Business Links
====> A Swarm of Traffic to Your Site <====
Targeted prospects will swarm your site 24/7!
Just 5 minutes to set-up. It's automated, "viral"
and proven - and best of all it's FREE!
http://www.trafficswarm.com/go.cgi?59216
http://home.fuse.net/ccg/smallbizlinks.html
--------------030008060309050309020007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="midHQzjc.4976$cY5.303663@news02.tsnz.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:W6-dnan8DdnlKxPdRVn-vA@comcast.com"><W6-dnan8DdnlKxPdRVn-vA@
co
mcast.com></a>, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:dalecusterj
says...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C42C6D.90390590
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought that rods were insects?!? you mean it's TRUE!?!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
A lot of things in the universe are true - but mankind remains
ignorant of them. Rods is probably the first of these 'unexplained'
phenomena that has the best chance of being the first - to be accepted,
and scientifically proven to exist - via videography/photography,
the others will slowly be accepted, given time?
Harvey
</pre>
</blockquote>
Does *anyone* follow the helpful and informative links I supply?<br>
<br>
Listen slowly... the ghost photos were *fake*, the rod photos were
*fake*. Please do your own internet searching from now on. BTW - those
links in my previous replies took a total of 5 minutes to find on
yahoo. It ain't rocket science Gumby.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="50">--
Chris Mork
Owner CCG Sales / Small Business Links
====> A Swarm of Traffic to Your Site <====
Targeted prospects will swarm your site 24/7!
Just 5 minutes to set-up. It's automated, "viral"
and proven - and best of all it's FREE!
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.trafficswarm.com/go.cgi?59216">http://www.trafficswarm.com/
go
.cgi?59216</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://home.fuse.net/ccg/smallbizlinks.html">http://home.fuse.net/ccg/
sm
allbizlinks.html</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------030008060309050309020007--
Oh sure, the rod videotape footage is fake.
As these guys were falling down ready to open their parachutes, in
Mexico -
some guy later added the 'fake' rods into the footage.
Ditto for many indepedent videoclips around the world, that have these
'rods' in them.
Yes, they are all fake sequences, sure.
Just because you supply some crappy 'ghost' stills which hardly look
like anything at all, all the photographic evidence for every ghost
photo is now deemed by you, to be all fake, and nothing else.
Typical total denial and dismissive - without looking into any of the
background of the individuals and how the prographs were taken, etc.
ie. no investigation or analysis.
I do know the various technical terms and tricks available to produce
fakes, etc (even before photoshop has become a standard PC tool) - so, I
am
not unfamiliar with 35mm still photography - or Television/video/cine
technology.
The 'rods' videofootage stands by itself - and it is apparent what it is,
to anyone who views the footage, run at normal speed, then at a slowed
down frame rate. Same for the various stills that have rarely surfaced.
Even experts in videotape analysis are aware of how unusual it is.
You can read all the skeptical comments you like - it doesn't change
the way things are.
In looking at the unexplained material - we're still in the stone age,
and the rocket science of today is very primitive, compared to UFO
standards.
People who place their faith in Einstein - may say - oh, nothing
can travel faster or at the speed of light (or near it) - that's
physically
impossible, therefore UFOs don't exist.
But if Einstein was alive today - he'll say something like - show me the
data, or let me see the data you have... meaning all the evidence there
is,
especially photographic, etc... and he may actually rework his ideas to
account for the possibilities that he was wrong, and produce something
better
or more accurate.
I demand as much proof as the next person. Why is our history so pock full
of holes. What happened in our ancient past? Was man primitive?
Then how come these large blocks of stone were moved around and worked
together to fit together like a child's jigsaw puzzle, and we can't do
that
today, with our technology? Now this is proof you can touch and weigh.
Or maybe these ancient sites are 'fakes'? Hey! maybe that's it. Everything
is fake. Yeh, right, especially those who believe the crap of
establishment,
like you do. That is fake. Scientific knowledge of the universe,
especially
that of archaeology.
Harvey