In article <409182a9$0$82257$a0465688@nnrp.fuse.net>, anon@nospam.com says...

Oh sure, the rod videotape footage is fake.
As these guys were falling down ready to open their parachutes, in Mexico -
some guy later added the 'fake' rods into the footage.

Ditto for many indepedent videoclips around the world, that have these
'rods' in them.
Yes, they are all fake sequences, sure.

Just because you supply some crappy 'ghost' stills which hardly look
like anything at all, all the photographic evidence for every ghost
photo is now deemed by you, to be all fake, and nothing else.
Typical total denial and dismissive - without looking into any of the 
background of the individuals and how the prographs were taken, etc.
ie. no investigation or analysis.

I do know the various technical terms and tricks available to produce
fakes, etc (even before photoshop has become a standard PC tool) - so, I am
not unfamiliar with 35mm still photography - or Television/video/cine
technology.

The 'rods' videofootage stands by itself - and it is apparent what it is,
to anyone who views the footage, run at normal speed, then at a slowed
down frame rate. Same for the various stills that have rarely surfaced.
Even experts in videotape analysis are aware of how unusual it is.

You can read all the skeptical comments you like - it doesn't change
the way things are.

In looking at the unexplained material - we're still in the stone age,
and the rocket science of today is very primitive, compared to UFO
standards.
People who place their faith in Einstein - may say - oh, nothing
can travel faster or at the speed of light (or near it) - that's physically
impossible, therefore UFOs don't exist.
But if Einstein was alive today - he'll say something like - show me the
data, or let me see the data you have... meaning all the evidence there is,
especially photographic, etc... and he may actually rework his ideas to
account for the possibilities that he was wrong, and produce something 

better

or more accurate.

I demand as much proof as the next person. Why is our history so pock full
of holes. What happened in our ancient past? Was man primitive?
Then how come these large blocks of stone were moved around and worked
together to fit together like a child's jigsaw puzzle, and we can't do that
today, with our technology? Now this is proof you can touch and weigh.
Or maybe these ancient sites are 'fakes'? Hey! maybe that's it. Everything
is fake. Yeh, right, especially those who believe the crap of establishment,
like you do. That is fake. Scientific knowledge of the universe, especially
that of archaeology.

Harvey

 

Admit it. You didn't even read the info at the sites I cited, did you? 
You just looked at the pictures and ignored the information about 
movement and frame speed and type of video interpolation.

The 'rods' are merely insects, the 'ghosts' are fakes.

I officially name you troll.

-- 


Chris Mork
Owner CCG Sales / Small Business Links


====> A Swarm of Traffic to Your Site <====
Targeted prospects will swarm your site 24/7!
Just 5 minutes to set-up. It's automated, "viral"
     and proven - and best of all it's FREE!
  http://www.trafficswarm.com/go.cgi?59216
   http://home.fuse.net/ccg/smallbizlinks.html

The photographs/stills you had on your/those sites speak for themselves,
the technical data you supply as to how they were taken, doesn't make
them look better or more convincing?
What you gonna do? Throw some silver pie plates into the air, photograph
them convincingly and call every photograph that was ever taken of a UFO,
as being 'fake'. Such is the logic you have been giving me.

The 'rods' shown on the television program 'rods!' were not small insects.
How large? are the insect rods you say are fakes.
Now say that all the photographic material on 'rods!' are fakes, even though
they are reported as coming from different sources, and say most
definitely the stills, too, in 'rods!' were faked.
Therefore everyone on that television program were on in it, knowing they
were presenting 'fake' material to the public, as genuine.

Give me some decent material to look at, and I'll examine it in detail.

I want the truth, and not more lies, thank you. Or wrong mis-intrepretations.

Harvey