i think it's more of a case of throwing their weight around, no different than the local school bully.

i mean think about it. apparently, you have technology which goes upteen times faster than the speed of light, so you can travel back and forth in time if einstiens theory on that works out, further, how much technology does it take to deciper out our language and hence, use your ufo technology to break into the local library, or better yet, patch into the network and download your own videos....

now i think there's more to it the little grey bastards from planet zeptar here to alter the generic code of monkeys to produce better humans.... i think it could very well be our own boys who have figured out how to build anti-gravitation devices....

after all, we've figured out how to blow things up by colliding uraniam and there are to our knowledge 114 - 120 elements to play with, what else can be produce by colliding some atoms together...

moreover, just as in the kennedy assassination, ask yourself:

"who (in our society) has the capability to deal with ufos?"
"who (in our society) has most to benefit from doing so?"
"who (in our society) is most likely to deny doing so?"

sorry, but all things considered we might as well toss alien conspiracy in with the kennedy assassination while we are at it....

as for these abductions... looks more like attention getters than anything else....

it's interesting however to see how hollywood is making use of all this, did you see the latest star-trek to hit the airwaves, last nights episode is actually using "reptillians" and "inter-galatic space councils" as part of the story line....

finally, at this point, it matters little if there are aliens or not... sure they could zap us all and turn us into slaves... but my point is, if they had wanted to do so (presuming that they really could) they could have done so by now.... but they haven't so they really cannot be all bad....

just my two cents worth for today

- perry


Geordie wrote:
> I have a number of difficult but very important questions which happen
> to involve very good friends of mine. They deal with questions about
> alien intervention which have perplexed me for many years now. If you
> can help please do.
> First of all why is it that, generally speaking, the individuals
> selected by the aliens to be examined are usually regarded by their
> neighbours and colleagues (before and after their abduction) as right
> plonkers?  It may well be that the aliens are interested in forensic
> psychiatry, but if that's the case then why give such dickheads
> messages for the rest of mankind? Who do the aliens think will believe
> them? It seems to me that they would be far better of, should they
> want individuals to tell the world, to choose some one the rest of us
> would at least listen to.
>  I raise this as my initial point because I have first hand experience
> of such individuals. My charity is always extended to the local drunks
> of the village where I was brought up. I attended school with them.
> Whilst they make a reasonable living they are by no means the sharpest
> tools in the box. But to be fair to them, they generally get by with
> only one or maybe two admissions to the acute unit each year. At
> school they were regarded as either weird and/or dullards and to a
> great extent performed (academically) as such. One of them has been
> abducted twice, both times at Hogmany (a period of drinking to excess)
> and not only was his brain removed for examination his intestinal
> tract was taken for cloning.(His three friends believe totally.) He
> has been on TV on a number of occasions talking about his ordeal. (One
> of our school pals is now a well known TV reporter and correspondent
> for a couple of US TV stations) One night when both the reporter and
> myself were carrying him home he confided in us that he had met the
> aliens that night in the toilet of the pub and  that the mother ship
> was going to show herself to us that night. It never happened and in
> the morning he couldn't remember meeting any one let alone aliens.
> Mind you we did not take him seriously because the reporter buddy
> found him, in the middle of winter, up to his waist in the river
> looking for his respiratory system which he had lost the night before.
> All four are lovable, friendly, kind and helpful people but although I
> love them they are accurately regarded as plonkers. The one thing you
> do not take from them is advice. Surely the aliens being superior to
> us would know this and find a messenger whom their intended audience
> would find credible?
> The second point I have to raise here is why do the aliens blow people
> up like balloons? And, why stick things up the subjects rectum,
> vagina, urethra down their throats? Anatomical literature is full of
> information right down to minute details of cell content so why do
> they risk exposure by,
> 1) using a duff anaesthetist (the subjects are half awake, feel pain
> and remember what was done to them!)?
> 2) replicating such experiments not just once but dozens of times?
> UFO literature is full of this sort of account.
> 3)allowing their research subjects to live and return to their homes?
> Not all are given a message!
> The more intelligent of my four pals is convinced, and he is not alone
> in his conviction a number of English universities have given grants
> and facilities to academics researching this field, that crop circles
> are the creation of aliens who are trying to contact humans. Now given
> that the aliens tend to take dickheads for research they should have
> been able to work out by now that, given the quality of the material
> they examined and the info gained, no one on earth could possibly work
> out what the message might be! So why communicate in such a perverse
> way? They would be better of taking a course with LinguaPhone. One of
> my buddies tells me that they may well be different aliens who do not
> have access to the others research! The wonders of whiskey!!
> The other point which has worried me for some time is the need by
> aliens to have lights on the side of their space craft whilst in
> flight? I could see the need for having lights on the side whilst
> docked to or in the mother ship but not whilst in flight. Revolving
> lights at that! Maybe someone forgot to switch them off! That could
> happen once and maybe twice but not all the time.
> I would be interested in getting a thread going on all of the above
> topics. But it seems to me that only the more seasoned  UFO watcher
> would have the knowledge and experience with which to bring to bear on
> such matters.
>
> Geordie


Gary Ledsham wrote:

Hi all,

Just a quick post to advertise a paranormal group that's very active,
looking for people to participate in the forum and discussion board.
If you'd like to join us please have a look around our site at :

http://www.cheshireparanormalsociety.co.uk/

There's a link there to our forum and information on future events and live
web cam broadcasts during our vigils.