Okay, I found the missing link


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/323657.stm

Okay, I subscribe to The Scientist, it's a web Magazine.  I read this
article on the subject of the Chagas Parasite Reading Refrence Link:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040723/01
{You might need to logon to read the article.  Basically, it's about a
parasite that leaves some of it's DNA behind after infecting an
individual.

In concept, and theory scientists have been using that kind of idea in
gene therapy, to help cure certain diseases.  Again, to be factual, of
course a refrence link is due.  For more interesting reading material,
click here for the Reading Refrence Link:
http://www.med.unc.edu/wrkunits/3ctrpgm/genether/

My conclusion, is that in the process of evolution the sudden
appearance of species is possible.  But, it is a result of a virus,
leaving a chunk of DNA behind.  The first link proves that the nature,
and naturally found viruses do leave behind some select amount of DNA,
and it does enter into the reproductive system in just such a fashion
that it is passed in breeding.  The second link acknowledges the same
is true but assumes that such genetic information cannot be passed on
to the next generation.  The first article proves otherwise, and that
the mitochondrial DNA can pass modified genes through the ovary.  This
is true because, in humans only the females pass the mitochondrial
DNA.  Therefore, in the process of evolution it should only be
accepted, and anticpated that the sudden appearance of new species
would be evident based upon the nature of known viruses.

This should result in no mystery, and cause no arguement Glance or
Read Refrence Link:
http://wiki.cotch.net/wiki.phtml?title=The_fossil_record_shows_sudden_appearance_followed_by_stasis

Now, considering the rates at which known viruses mutate in order to
survive, as found in this list of multiple research articles found at
this Glance Refrence link:
http://www.microbiology.wustl.edu/training/courses/molvir/genVar

That from one generation to the next a single herd, or small
geographic area may produce, and resproduce several generations and
each being infected by alternate mutated viruses spawning from the
first donor produce a nearly completely different mutation from
several genetic modifications over a few short generations in
breeding.

And with the frequency of fossil remains from any given creature being
at approximately 0.1%, which would be like the teeth but, not the jaw,
and usually teeth defines a situation that makes it clear that we may
not even see fossils for two or three generations.  Glance Refrence
Link: http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/dinos/de_4/5c60e6e.htm

Then the consideration for how many fossils we actually find, and the
actual examination of sites located before mined, or developed, puts
the potential of even finding such changes down to a point of the
sudden appearance of a appearent new species.  My point, they do
evolve from evolving viruses that drop off some part of the viral DNA.