| Subject: Re: STARGATE REMOTE VIEWING CD COLLECTION |
| From: The_Sage |
| Date: 01/08/2004, 03:21 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo.reports |
Reply to article by: Todd Lemire <tlemire@nospam.com>
Date written: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:29:23 -0400
MsgID:<7p6dnTKd09DzgJHcRVn-pQ@comcast.com>
The recently acquired 14 CD ROM - CIA STARGATE Remote Viewing
Government document collection is now available for purchase.
Details can be found here:
http://www.michiganufos.com/stargate.html
Why would anyone want to view the results of a failed experiment? The remote
viewing (RV) experiment was a complete flop since the whole entire goal of the
RV program was to see if RV had "any utility for intelligence collection" (AN
EVALUATION OF REMOTE VIEWING: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, by Michael D Mumford,
Andrew M. Rose, and David A. Goslin, pg E4-5). In 22 years of study, it had (and
still has) no utility whatsoever and was "unpromising"...
"As mandated by Congress, CIA is reviewing available information and past
research programs concerning parapsychological phenomena, mainly 'Remote
Viewing' to determine whether they might have any utility for intelligence
collection. - CIA sponsored research on this subject in the 1970s -- At that
time, the program, always considered speculative and controversial, was
determined to be unpromising" (CIA STATEMENT ON 'REMOTE VIEWING', by the CIA
Public Affairs Office, 6 September 1995)
And no wonder it was so unpromising, as the the experiment was completely
flawed: their 'data' was determined to be sloppy, vague, and supported only by
alot of wishful thinking, therefore it could prove nor disprove anything
factually...
"It is unclear whether the observed effects can unambiguously be attributed
to the paranormal ability of the remote viewers as opposed to characteristics
of the judges or of the target or some other characteristic of the methods
was used. Use of the same remote viewers, the same judge, and the same target
photographs makes it impossible to identify their independent effects" (AN
EVALUATION OF REMOTE VIEWING: RESERACH AND APPLICATIONS by M. D. Mumford, A.
M. Rose and D. Goslin, published by AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH, pg E3)
"The information provided was inconsistent, inaccurate with regard to
specifics, and required substantial subjective interpretation" (AN EVALUATION
OF REMOTE VIEWING: RESERACH AND APPLICATIONS by M. D. Mumford, A. M. Rose and
D. Goslin, published by AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH, pg E4)
"In no case had the information provided ever been used to guide intelligence
operations" (AN EVALUATION OF REMOTE VIEWING: RESERACH AND APPLICATIONS by M.
D. Mumford, A. M. Rose and D. Goslin, published by AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR
RESEARCH, pg E4)
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage
"My friend plans to make a fortune with his invention. It's a
big metal box with a slot on one side and a sign that says
'How gullible are you? To find out, insert $50.'" -- COMEDY
COMES CLEAN, by Bill Jones
=============================================================