"Mr. 4X" <random.nfbi@kzvp.invalid.com> schreef in bericht
news:Xns953BF0D8CEA71mr4x@195.228.240.20...

"Roger Davies" <anderson_451@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:WVFDc.57913$ly2.19123@doctor.cableinet.net:

I write this in response to Robert K Rouse' article "HALF A CENTURY OF
THE GERMAN MOON BASE " (http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/moonger.html).
Since I was unable to contact him directly, I'm posting it here.

It is intreguing, and I do enjoy a juicy conspiracy theory!

But I can't help but notice a few flaws.  Please don't see this as an
attempt to undermine.  I genuinely would like to know a few answers.

"the Haunibu-1 and 2 type were used after 1944 to haul people,
materiel and the first robots to the construction site on the Moon"

Are you suggesting that robots existed in 1944?!?  Around this time
man had yet to even master eletric circuitry (they had only just begun
experimenting with wires in cabinets large enough to fill a house ...
and even THEY were utterly unreliable!)

This is not 100% correct. In 1944 many kinds of electronic circuitry
were already developed, but almost all of them were analogue, used for
radio communication, very primitive TV, and audio
recording/playback/manipulation. It's very exaggerated to say 'man had
yet to even master eletric circuitry'. But all of these worked with
vacuum tubes, which were large, unreliable and required lots of extra
power for the cathode heating. I really doubt that it would have been
possible to send any astronauts to the Moon (unless someone would be
able to do it with very simple and large electronic gear, and no computer
better than the ENIAC). And of course intelligent robots are completely
out of question.

"I have proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that there is atmosphere,
water and vegetation on the Moon, "

Sounds like someone smoked too much pot.

So why am I unable to see any such vegetation with a telescope?  This
is suggesting that ALL NASAs public photos of the moon are fake.  And
thus, the moon landing video too (although even I have my doubts about
the moon landings!)

"but that could have been easily done with the large antigravity
drives of the ship."

...I have seen no evidence to suggest antigravity drives exist, and

Since when do kooks care about facts? :)

many prominant scientists even argue that it is impossible even in
theory.

"it was also due to the smaller gravitational fleld of Mars generating
less power for the tachyon drives"

Hahahaha. That's kookier than Star Trek.

How does gravitational field effect the energy output of the techyon
drives?

If you look for the definition of a "tachyon" :

(dictionary.com) "A tachyon is a hypothetical particle that travels at
superluminal velocities"

(Websters) "A hypothetical subatomic particle that always travels
faster than the speed of light."

Anyhow, its a cool theory, ( I do have lots of pictures of the hanabu
craft, etc) and I'm doing a lot of reading (many other people believe
this too, so it's certainly worthy of "mainstream conspiracy theory")

Yes those Haunebu craft are certainly genuine but the question is did they
go to the moon or mars or even Aldeberan..  with the Haunebu 3  and or
reached it  and how about coming back to earth etc. ?
Haunebu 3 was capable of reaching the moon or Mars or perhaps even
further...but I don't think they made the actually trip.  but they were
planning to..

Onno

Later!

~Rog.