Subject: Re: More PROOF 9/11 Was a Military Op: NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL
From: Aratzio
Date: 09/08/2004, 15:18
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.fucknozzles

On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:43:30 -0600, "C.R. Osterwald" <rio@dev.null>
transparently proposed:

In article <cvkeh01mgii2q28a1t84hq35qenkd6vfi3@4ax.com>, Charles D.
Bohne <Spam@PasoSchweiz.de> wrote:

What ever happened to ADUST?
C.

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:50:44 GMT, Anti-Debunkers United for Scientific
Truth [ADUST] <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <al7t32$1s1v$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, Goldi says...

http://americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html

NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

[screed snip]

Reposting old k0oK theories again, Chuckweasel?

Regression Therapy?