Notorious net kook and utter ignoramus Garrrry "Always Wrong" Bryan wrote:

> In alt.alien.visitors Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
 > : Notorious net kook and utter ignoramus Garrrry "Always Wrong"
> : Bryan wrote:
 >
> :> In alt.alien.visitors Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
 > :> : Notorious net kook and utter ignoramus Garrrry "Always Wrong"
> :> : Bryan wrote:
 > :>
> :> :> There was no information regarding the 9/11 plot found on any of the computer
 > :> :> discs and hard drives they recovered during the latest Pakistan arrest. . .
 > :>
> :> : And you know this how, kook?
 > :>
> :> They certainly didn't report that they had found intel related to the Twin
 > :> Towers
 >
> : Are you claiming you are somehow privy to everything recovered? So
> : you went down to CIA Headquarters and got yourself a high-level,
> : personal briefing, did you? I have always known you were
> : delusional, Garrrrrry, but you just seem to be getting more and
> : more out of touch with reality as time goes on.
 >
> Blah blah blah, your opinions mean nothing. . .

Keep telling yourself that.

>
> :> which they would parade out to "prove" Al Qeada was behind the plot. . .
 >
> : Um, that was proven beyond any doubt long ago, kook. Have you
> : forgotten that Bin Laden himself has admitted to it on several
> : occasions? Exactly how much more proof do you need, kook? Found
> : those puddles of molten steel yet?
 >
> The pools of molten steel were reported by Mark Loizeaux of Controlled
> Demolition. He will tell you

He will? Have you confirmed this? I would have confirmed it before making a fool of myself. Kooks like you though just like to charge on ahead and "Damn the torpedoes" of truth that tend to come in from all directions and blow you out of the water.

> about the workers reports.

So assuming for a moment Mark Loizeaux actually did make that claim, then he must have got his information second or third hand at best. So actually the supposed credibility of Mark Loizeaux lends nothing to the credibility of the story, now does it?

> There are probably
 > photos of it

Oh yeah, but no doubt the evil conspiracy has suppressed them, right?

> since you claimed this was the most photographed clean up in
> history. Rag on him about the reports.

Why would I rag on him? He's not the one making an ass of himself here. You are.

> and as far as bin Laden:
 > http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines

Ananova???? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Oh that's real credible. A story that doesn't cite any sources appearing on a tabloid web shite is the best you can do? So the translations of those videos that appeared on Al Jazeera where he claimed responsibility were all wrong? Sorry, kook, but it came right out of the horse's own mouth in the world-wide media. This feeble attempt of yours to perpetuate your kooky fantasy that the US government itself was somehow behind 9/11 ain't gonna fly. Wake up and smell the reality already, kook.

--- Drivel snip ---

>
>
>
> :> just wait for the report to come out. . .
 >
> : You mean like how you *couldn't wait* and started making kooky
> : pronouncements about what was or wasn't found, despite the fact
> : that actually you have no clue?
 >
> What do you know about what I have or don't have? Wild speculation on your part.

Experience, Garrrrrrry. I know from long experience that you have no clue about anything, and are just talking out of your ass as always.

>
> : or ask the FBI. . .
 >
> : Ask them what? Whether you are a kook? I'm sure they already know
> : that. It would be interesting to do an FOIA request and see what
> : sort of file they have on you. That Picture of you and your "Pump
> : Room Gang" alone would have been enough to get you on their radar
> : back in the J. Edgar Hoover era.
 >
> Thread fade has begun. . .

Speaking of fading. What ever happened to your promise to fade away into the sunset in a boat with that mule you married? What happened to the great "happily ever after" you claimed was gonna happen after Agilent downsized your lazy, worthless, ass?

>
> :> but you never do
 > :> your own work, just nay-say. . .
 >
> : Hypocrisy noted, kook. Where is the work to back up your nutty
> : claims, any of them?
 >
> Why the fuck

A little melty today, Garrrrrry?

> do I need to prove anything to you?

Because that's the way it works. You make a claim, you back it up, otherwise you aren't worthy of being believed. I've only been trying to get that through your thick skull for about five years now. I guess you just can't teach old kooks new tricks.

> You have been given evidence
 > before regarding many things

Yes, as opposed to you.

> and you just refuse to accept it.

Why would anyone accept anything you say? You've never been right about anything.

> Why should now
 > bw any different. You still don't think that the flag that draped on Saddam's
 > toppled statue had flown over the Pentagon,

Revisionist history noted, kook. You originally claimed that flag was the one flying over The Pentagon on the day it was attacked, not that it was just one of the thousands of flags run up the pole for a little while then hauled down and sold to tourists. Either way, the claim remains unproven.

> even when I gave you the name of
 > the marine and his fathers address to write to and get the story. . .

Translation: You want others to research your claims for you.

> you are
> intellectually lazy. . .

Look who's talking! You are beyond intellectually lazy, Garrrrry. You are incapable of even thinking for yourself. You have your every thought spoon fed to you by the liberal lunatic fringe, and accept them all unquestioningly no matter how absurd they are, rather than even try think for yourself. No wonder you call yourself a Deadhead. You really are dead between the ears.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"I don't have to do anything except post my name and it get ridiculed whether it has anything to do with UFO's or not." - Garrrry Bryan brags about the reputation he has built for himself.