If the "evidence" is inconclusive, then it isn't evidence, it is 
insignificant
trivia.

stack overflow
recursive function does not bottom

let me push this little chromium switch to reset the processor

its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
because its not evidence because it doesnt lead to your conclusion
stack overflow

darn

listen up uh clem
evidence remains evidence whether you like it or not

when you let your desired conclusion decide what is evidence
you are excluding anything that could show you are wrong
simply because it could show you are wrong

this is the data filtering error that continues to plague
your blessed science

if you want scientifically valid results
you have to account for nearly all the evidence
(a tiny fraction can be ignored as observation error)
whether it supports your conclusions or not

evidence of ufos exists whether you like it or not
and you have account for it as a psychological phenomenona
(and not merely dismiss everyone you disagree with as nuts)
or a terrestial phenomona


i do tire of all you clownshoes pretending to be logical
when you obviously havent a clue what logic is

you too
and you
and you

arf meow arf