| Subject: Re: WHO TAKES ETS SERIOUSLY? |
| From: mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges |
| Date: 02/10/2004, 21:38 |
| Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo,alt.alien |
listen up uh clem evidence remains evidence whether you like it or notEveryone knows that so now it is your turn to listen up and hear what you've been missing all along: In science there is a big difference legitimate evidence
youre doing the same thing with different words youre letting your conclusions decide what is evidence thereby excluding any evidence against you
and alleged evidence. Hearsay and meresay is not legitimate evidence...whether
hearsay is a legal term not scientific courts exclude hearsay not because it might be false but because it does not provide the opposing party a chance to crossexamine its irrelevant anyway because there is testimony of people of their own experience and that is not hearsay under any definition
My conclusions are always based on the actual evidence, not the alledged or so-called evidence.
the filterring error you filter out data which does not match your conclusion
this is the data filtering error that continues to plague your blessed scienceIt isn't my science that condemns you, it is everyone's science.
a good example of the filtering error is that the ozone hole was detected long before anyone noticed but the instruments had been programed to regard the data as error and discard it
All I'm interested in is facts and you have none to support your UFO=ET conclusion. I'm still waiting for you niwmwits to reply to my original post
classical alt-atheist error you misinterpret any critique of your so-called proofs i have no conclusions therefore i have no need to support my nonconclusions
rather than your dodge and evade of the issues.
if you cant stand the heat stay out of the kitchen if you pretend intellectual superiority expect to be challenged
(and not merely dismiss everyone you disagree with as nuts)I'm sure glad I have never done that...but it is good advice anyway, in case there are others out there like yourself.
its really not fun dealing with someone who knows more than you is it? think about that next time you flounce it and lay down your truth like a neogod carving tablets on mt sion
Too bad you can't tell the difference yourself, otherwise you might accidentally discover that you stare at a clownshoe everyday when you go to comb your hair in a mirror.
i love it when you logical people can keep your cool simple fact is that nobody has an conclusive explanation that satisifies a wide and diverse community and nearly all the evidence and anybody with a shred of intellectual honesty would acknowledge that lack of knowledge perhaps it is solely a psychological phenomena something triggers in a wide variety of people these visions and sounds learning if and what that trigger is by itself would be very interesting and advance human knowledge much further than simply labelling them all as crackpots and meresay and hearsay arf meow arf