On 5 Oct 2004 03:37:32 -0700, judoka_61@hotmail.com (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

"Wally Anglesea" whined:<wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote in message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5.3794@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...

Newsgroups re-added, fuckwit.

You crossposted again retard.

No, I put AUK in. YOu are on topic in that group. Live with it.

That's ok postalette, I will make another web page O'fun that will
display your idiocy again.

There we go again: http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm

2: Polaroid pictures can be altered directly, *before* being scanned
in.

Are you saying that polaroid instant pictures can be alterate before ?

YES, you babbling retarded kook.

So, you  say that instant photo can be alterate with photoshop before.

You illiterate, microcephalic, obsessed, moron. Please translate the
above sentence into something approaching English, and I will explain
it.

And what you can see in those instant photos ? ..some swirls of colors

Amongst other things. The point is, your pathetic attempt to claim
that obviously faked polaroids are somehow incontrovertible evidence,
is nullified. 
Live with failure, Pietro. That's all you have.

?

:P
 

Pietro, you fucked up, microcephalic,third-world educated, moronic,
incoherent, babbling clown,  YES POLAROIDS CAN BE "alterate" before
they are scanned in.

Polaroids can be altered DIRECTLY on the emulsion, without a computer.

JEBUS, you are an idiot.

Before what, you completely stupid dumb ignorant
motherfucking bastard.?

Well,that's a question for Wally aglesea, but it seems that he already
left for the shark bay see:
http://images.google.it/images?hl=it&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=wallyanglesea&btnG=Cerca

What are you stalking for?  

..stalking ? I just wrote you name in google search.

With images as the search pattern. Interesting.

Yes, that's one of the images I used in an image competition.

ok

We modify scanned in images. That should tell you something,

Yep, it tell me something ..you are just another clown.

No, you baboon. It means I know a WHOLE LOT MORE about photography and
manipulating images than you can possibly imagine.

you obsessed moronic microcephalic nitwit.

[incendiary language noted] 

Nope, an accurate description of you. Live with it, kook.

Wow !

Ahh, you found my challenge pictures in the Photoshop Challenge group.
Yes, we manipulate images using photoshop.  I haven't done any for
some time.

You are just trying to cover the postastalette-deficient-displayed in
the beginning of this subject (Filiberto Caponi's instant photo)
http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm

Again:
Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about:
<<the exhibition of hand alterate Polaroids>>  because the Caponi's
instant pictures show a humanoid, and not simple swirls of colors or
ghosty highlights.

I've told you before, and I will tell you again. Polaroids can be

altered

BEFORE they are scanned in. 

I agree with that, but this is not the Caponi'case.

PROVE IT.



Can't?  Thought not. Case closed. Thanks for playing.

This case (as I told you several time) reverberate Internationally.
Filiberto Caponi'instant pictures were published BEFORE in the
newspapers
and spotlighted on television:  --->> THEN (AFTER) those pictures were
confiscated by the judge, --->> because of this confiscation, CUN
could only analyze them visually but not instrumentally.

Now if those pictures are an hoax, why the judge do not allow to
analyze those instant pictures instrumenally ?

In one hand "YOU" claim that those pictures are alterate<-->in the
other hand you do not allow to analize those pictures instrumentally.

We could. If there was anything more than a kooky claim on a kook
webshite.  Unfortunately, there isn't. No supporting evidence. No
evidence that any  judge confiscated anything. Just a kooky webshite.

That's all you have.

Too bad.

<snip o' kookfart>


-- 

http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."