Subject: Re: Wally &Shark
From: Larry Huntley
Date: 05/10/2004, 16:49
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks

Wally Anglesea� stepped up to the podium, tapped the forlorn-looking SM57,
asked "Is this thing on?" and, in alt.alien.visitors, message
news:pg05m01q2fvvjs17sc07nvq1cdjf98g4a0@4ax.com, prounounced: 

On 5 Oct 2004 03:37:32 -0700, judoka_61@hotmail.com (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

"Wally Anglesea" whined:<wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote
in message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5.3794@news-server.bigpond.net.au>... 

Newsgroups re-added, fuckwit.

You crossposted again retard.

No, I put AUK in. YOu are on topic in that group. Live with it.


That's ok postalette, I will make another web page O'fun that will
display your idiocy again.

There we go again: http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm

2: Polaroid pictures can be altered directly, *before* being scanned
in.

Are you saying that polaroid instant pictures can be alterate before
? 

YES, you babbling retarded kook.

So, you  say that instant photo can be alterate with photoshop before.

You illiterate, microcephalic, obsessed, moron. Please translate the
above sentence into something approaching English, and I will explain
it.

And what you can see in those instant photos ? ..some swirls of colors

Amongst other things. The point is, your pathetic attempt to claim
that obviously faked polaroids are somehow incontrovertible evidence,
is nullified. 

Wally, I'm pretty sure that you're using words that are far too large
for Pietie to understand.

- L
-- Larry Huntley Beaverton, Oregon Skep-Ti-Cult� Member #130-978649-969 http://www.skepticult.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 14, 2004, alchameth2@yahoo.com (Edmond Wollmann) wrote in alt.astrology, message news:35325a08.0405140836.292b2a8d@posting.google.com:
Would you like me to yank your internet account now or later?