Wally Anglesea? <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in message news:<pg05m01q2fvvjs17sc07nvq1cdjf98g4a0@4ax.com>...
Newsgroups re-added, fuckwit.
You crossposted again retard.
No, I put AUK in.
Right, you crossposted again moron.
I post in a alt.alien.visitor, in this ng the topic is UFOs and ETs,
we can talk about these issue, if you and the other trolls don't
belive in these matters you can always post in another ng.
YOu are on topic in that group.
Actually you and your kind are the only real topic in that group.
Live with it.
You already live with that, retard.
That's ok postalette, I will make another web page O'fun that will
display your idiocy again.
There we go again: http://ufologie.net/htm/caponi.htm
2: Polaroid pictures can be altered directly, *before* being
scanned in.
Are you saying that polaroid instant pictures can be alterate before ?
YES, you babbling retarded kook.
Well, those pictures were pubblished *BEFORE* in the newspaper then
*AFTER* those pictures were confiscated by a judge.
The judge had confiscated the originals pictures *AFTER* those
pictures were pubblished in the newspaper.
How many time I have to tell you retard ?
[So, you say that instant photo can be alterate with photoshop
before.]
> You illiterate,
Do you speak also very good Italian, French or Spanish ?
microcephalic, obsessed, moron.
[projection noted]
Please translate the above sentence into something approaching English, and I > will explain it.
********************************************************************************
You said:
Polaroid pictures can be alterate directly, *before* being scanned in.
I said:
Are you saying that polaroid instant pictures can be alterate before ?
you said:
yes, you babbling retarded kook.
I translate the above sentence:
Thanks for confirming that.
*****************************************************************************
And what you can see in those instant photos ? ..some swirls of colors
Amongst other things. The point is, your pathetic attempt to claim
that obviously faked polaroids are somehow incontrovertible evidence,
is nullified.
Obviously faked polaroids ?
Why the judge do not allow to analyze those pictures instrumentally.
Then we can be sure if those pictures are fakes.
Live with failure, Pietro. That's all you have.
Actually you are living with failure, look at you clown !
Pietro, you fucked up, microcephalic,third-world educated, moronic,
incoherent, babbling clown, YES POLAROIDS CAN BE "alterate" before
they are scanned in.
Polaroids can be altered DIRECTLY on the emulsion, without a computer.
JEBUS, you are an idiot.
Before what, you completely stupid dumb ignorant
motherfucking bastard.?
Well,that's a question for Wally aglesea, but it seems that he already
left for the shark bay see:
http://images.google.it/images?hl=it&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=wallyanglesea&btnG=Cerca
What are you stalking for?
..stalking ? I just wrote you name in google search.
With images as the search pattern. Interesting.
[paranoia noted]
Did you take your pills today ?
Yes, that's one of the images I used in an image competition.
ok
We modify scanned in images. That should tell you something,
Yep, it tell me something ..you are just another clown.
No, you baboon. It means I know a WHOLE LOT MORE about photography and
manipulating images than you can possibly imagine.
You just look more ridiculous.
you obsessed moronic microcephalic nitwit.
[incendiary language noted]
Nope, an accurate description of you. Live with it, kook.
[projection noted again]
Wow !
Ahh, you found my challenge pictures in the Photoshop Challenge group.
Yes, we manipulate images using photoshop. I haven't done any for
some time.
You are just trying to cover the postastalette-deficient-displayed in
the beginning of this subject (Filiberto Caponi's instant photo)
http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
http://ufologie.net/htm/caponi.htm
Again:
Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about:
<<the exhibition of hand alterate Polaroids>> because the Caponi's
instant pictures show a humanoid, and not simple swirls of colors or
ghosty highlights.
I've told you before, and I will tell you again. Polaroids can be
altered
BEFORE they are scanned in.
I agree with that, but this is not the Caponi'case.
PROVE IT.
I did that before, but you are in denial.
[AGAIN]
Filiberto Caponi instant pictures were published *BEFORE* in the
*NEWSPAPERS*
and spotlighted on television, then *AFTER* those pictures were
*CONFISCATED* BY the judge.
The judical provision has been taken shortly after French, German, and
Japanese news media had relayed the information, and it prevented all
the investigations.
Italian ufologist still do not understand the reason for this lawsuit.
This case was debated again and again in tv, and no evidences of fraud
has been found.
http://ufologie.net/htm/caponi.htm
http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
HERE,I'm talking about:
REAL JUDGES
REAL NEWSPAPERS
REAL TV/NEWS MEDIA
These are the proofs, everybody known about that, but you are still in
denial.
Can't? Thought not. Case closed. Thanks for playing.
Read above moron, if you don't belive me, search in internet or simply
go in a Pubblic Library.
(Major Libraries have decades of newspapers on microfiche)
This case (as I told you several time) reverberate Internationally.
Filiberto Caponi'instant pictures were published BEFORE in the
newspapers
and spotlighted on television: --->> THEN (AFTER) those pictures were
confiscated by the judge, --->> because of this confiscation, CUN
could only analyze them visually but not instrumentally.
Now if those pictures are an hoax, why the judge do not allow to
analyze those instant pictures instrumentally ?
In one hand "YOU" claim that those pictures are alterate
in the
other hand you do not allow to analize those pictures instrumentally.
We could. If there was anything more than a kooky claim on a kook
webshite.
I told you several times:
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
A real judge confiscated those instant pictures and do not allow to
analyze those pictures INSTRUMENTALLY.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
some real POLICE OFFICERS seized those pictures ..
AFTER THEIR FIRST PUBLICATION IN THE MEDIA.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
some real NEWSPAPERS/MAGAZINE/PRESS AGENCIES debated this case.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
some real INTERNATIONAL TV/NEWS MEDIA debated this case.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Unfortunately, there isn't. No supporting evidence. No
Unfortunately for you, when the answer is so obvious you wants to run
and hide and go in denial because it makes your debunking/discredit
efforts look like the "muppets show".
evidence that any judge confiscated anything. Just a kooky webshite.
Now Ladies and Gentlemen Wally-moron claim that there is a
International new/media conspiracy against him.
See my *friend*, I don't know anything about the law in USA or in
Australia but, in Italy if you put a kooky webshite and start to say
lies, and use the names of some:
magazines, newspapers, news/media, journalists, policemen, or just
referring to the magistracy of an Italian city, they can take you in a
Court of Law.
(no shit)
That's all you have.
Isn't enough ?
Too bad.
Yeah, too bad. (for you)
<snip o' kookfart>
THE CASE IS CLOSED ----->> WALLY ANGLESEA IS ON THE RUN !