coz umanbeans r interestin 4 ale's
"The_Sage" <a.b@c.com> wrote in message 
news:ac4jm0p8dpublea7feh88t3t8ueerifs2h@4ax.com...

The comical elusiveness of the alleged ETs has made the UFO community the
laughingstock of the world. If the ETs goal is to lie low and not 
interfere,
then they blew it! If the ETs goal is to become involved in human affairs, 
then
they blew that already too! No, either the ETs are juvenile delinquents 
who are
wasting theirs and our time and resources or the ETs have a teenage crush 
on us
but they are too shy to ever do anything openly about it.

Or maybe, as Bufo Calvin would say, "The aliens must be idiots". I too 
have
heard all about the ETs and the stories of broken-down spaceships, of 
abductees
being put back into bed with their clothes on backwards or in the wrong
vehicles, or of aliens using a wheat field as a method of communication, 
so yes!
Maybe the aliens must be idiots! Think about it: would you be willing to 
buy
into the story that an intellectually superior race that could travel
interstellar distances, would go through all the trouble to come to our 
planet
just to put on a second-rate airshow for our viewing pleasure? And the 
highlight
of this show is to create silly patterns in wheat fields and mutilate 
cattle? As
we have seen so far in this FAQ, the only ones putting on a show for us 
here are
the UFO believers who will stop at nothing to descend the deepest depths 
of
gullibility in order to justify their make believe religion.

As I've asked before, why do people take so much UFO/ET media propaganda, 
so
seriously and without question? Is it any wonder that the UFO community 
has such
a poor reputation for being realistic and objective, when the UFO media 
appears
to report ANYTHING anyone wants to tell them, without regard to reasonable
questioning of the alleged facts of the matter? Reports like the Red UFO 
in
Gilbert only seem to further damage what I view as the UFO community's 
already
poor reputation, but I am starting to wonder if the UFO community even 
gives a
damn about reality or their reputation?

Besides, if there really are aliens visiting us out there, why won't they 
visit
me? I'm willing and available and unlike many of the people they've been
abducting so far, I'm not a complete idiot because I can actually think 
for
myself. I'm not afraid to relate with alien sentient beings, no matter 
what they
look like. Not only that, I'm smart enough to take the time to stop and 
ask for
some evidence of my abduction. Say like asking for samples of their native 
food
(something that won't spoil right away) or some harmless technical 
artifact. The
problem right now is that if the aliens really are abducting all these 
people
I've been seeing relating their stories in magazines, books, TV, and the
internet, the problem is that the poor aliens are going to get the wrong 
idea of
what humans are really like or what they can be like. With the likes of 
much of
what they've been abducting, they are going to think humans are a bunch of 
Homer
Simpsons and I don't want the aliens to think that I'm anything at all 
like the
people they've been abducting so far.

  >Ironically, there is another normal science argument that turns Drake 
and
  >Sagan on their collective heads: The Fermi Paradox. Enrico Fermi is 
credited
  >with asking, "Where are the aliens?". He and others, including Frank 
Tipler,
  >have reasoned that if there have been hi-tech ETs in the galaxy, they 
should
  >have been able to colonize it all in short leaps by now. Therefore, 
since
  >they are obviously not here, there is something wrong, they must not 
have
  >existed in the first place. "It should be, but it isn't, therefore it 
never
  >was". Both the Drake-Sagan and Fermi-Tipler arguments assume that the
  >ufological evidence is invalid, but they use this assumption in
  >contradictory ways.

The problem with the Fermi Paradox is that it is based on false 
assumptions.
They act as though a far more intelligent race would act just as stupid as 
we
do...

  "I would like to share a revelation that I've had, during my time here. 
It
  came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that 
you're
  not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet, instinctively 
develops an
  equilibrium with it's surrounding environment, but you humans do not. 
You
  move to an area and you multiply and multiply, until every natural 
resource
  is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. 
There
  is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you 
know
  what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this 
planet; you
  are a plague and we are the cure" (Agent Smith, THE MATRIX, Warner 
Brothers,
  1999)

Obviously, a species intelligent enough to traverse light years of space 
would
be a species that learned to not destroy itself and it's environment; a 
species
that would not want to spread to another part of the galaxy like a 
plague --
those are things WE humans would do if we could travel through space, but 
that
doesn't imply everyone else in the universe thinks like we do.

  >I think a humanity spreading throughout the galaxy would be at least a 
small
  >measure more of a good thing than a bad thing.

I disagree since I wouldn't want tourists ruining the solar system with 
their
graffiti or trash or having to put up with a 7-11 on every corner of the 
galaxy.
I want the solar system to be pure and untouched and pristine, the same as 
the
day when I first saw it.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================