Reply to article by: "the Ghost of Pete Charest" <pc@burninhell.com>
Date written: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:36:20 GMT
MsgID:<8minm0pileo1v5f8hppbub0n349c99evvn@4ax.com>

There are no "if's" about it, the current UFO phenomenon most definitely is
"beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation" and that is
exactly what the dictionary defines as paranormal.

If  the current UFO phenomenon is "beyond the range of normal
experience" as you claim, how the fuck do people 'see' them ?

I have been following your 'debate' with Kavik.
You come off as an idiot, Kavik displays common sense.
You are in Raving denial of the evidence.Inconclusive as it may be, it
is still evidence. You can whine about it 'not' being evidence all you
like to, please do. I find your pathetic attempts quite amusing.

Your constant denial of the bloody obvious is what is "beyond the
range of normal experience". 

Have a nice fucking day.

Listen up spooge for brains, the definition clearly states that you have one of
two choices for the UFO phenomenon to be considered paranormal:

I don't consider the UFO phenomenon to be paranormal, after all ,
people do 'see' them, don't they ?

By your "logic", since ghosts can be seen, therefore they are not considered
paranormal by you. Of course, you are the only person in the world ignorant
enough to use that kind of logic. Come back when you have a real arguement to
give...one you can support with facts and logic instead of illitracy and
ignorance.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================