Subject: Re: Wally &Shark
From: Art Deco
Date: 22/10/2004, 03:38
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.conspiracy

Pietro Sommavilla <judoka_61@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Wally Anglesea" whined:<wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote in 
 message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5.3794@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
  
http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm
 Again:
Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about:
 <<the exhibition of hand alterate Polaroids>>  because the Caponi's
instant pictures show a humanoid, and not simple swirls of colors or
ghosty highlights.
 
I've told you before, and I will tell you again. Polaroids can be
altered
BEFORE they are scanned in. 

I agree with that, but this is not the Caponi'case.
This case (as I told you several time) reverberate Internationally.
Filiberto Caponi'instant pictures were published BEFORE in the
newspapers
and spotlighted on television:  --->> THEN (AFTER) those pictures were
confiscated by the judge, --->> because of this confiscation, CUN
could only analyze them visually but not instrumentally.
 
Now if those pictures are an hoax, why the judge do not allow to
analyze those instant pictures instrumenally ?
 
In one hand "YOU" claim that those pictures are alterate<-->in the
other hand you do not allow to analize those pictures instrumentally.
 
..HELLO !!? 
 
Yet for months you obsessively claimed they could not. 
 
read above retard.
 
Polaroids can be, and are altered by hand, and not just so they 
have "swirls of colours", you baboon
  
..yes, they have also the amazing chiken-shark.
 http://tinyurl.com/24a49

BTW: for the future.
  
STOP claiming those instant pictures don't exist or that there were
any originals pictures, get the whole story in internet or get copies
of newspaper archives.

STOP to claim that those pictures are an obvious fake like the
"amazing crocolile goat" untill the authorities allow some scientists
to analyze those instant pictures.

Do not start to say like jamie drpostman eckles:
************************************************************
from:DrPostman
subject:DrPostman&Photoshop
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.fan.art-bell
date: 2004-07-06 14:01:30 PST
once a pic has been alterate, and especially created in
Photoshop there is no way to scan something to verify it.
************************************************************
  
http://hubble.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=33314
 ....because we live in a highly technological world.
  
STOP claiming now that some judges, policemen and journalists made it
up.
  
I'm not.  However, it's evident that someone who wants you to beleive
it's
real, made it up. 
 
GOOD ! Then we have a solution: LET'S ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES
INSTRUMENTALLY.
 
Not the judges, not the police, and probably not any 
journalist. It's as good a picture as the amazing crocodile goat
monkey that
goes around in a travelling carny. 
 
GOOD ! THEN LET'S ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY !
 
Sorry you beleive in all that shite, but 

Sorry my ass  ..LET'S ANALIZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY.
 
then, your education *is* less than third world.
 
This is not about education, or third word, this is about to
 
 --------->>   ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY.
  
Well, you seem to have completely missed the point again.
  
The only point is the one on the top of your head.

GAAA !! I keep trying to talk about the aliens issue and you keep
changing the topic to yourself !
 :P

My earlier post was premature, Pietro, this is a much better meltdown,
well done.

All I can say is why aren't SCIENTISTS ALLOWED TO ANALIZE
INSTRUMENTALLY YOUR BRAIN in order to determine the cause(s) of your
kneejerk posting obsession!

--