On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:04:09 -0700, The_Sage <a.b@c.com> wrote:

Reply to article by: "the Ghost of Pete Charest" <pc@burninhell.com>
Date written: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:45:09 GMT
MsgID:<5952n01p5i0kj61ikaeq5cj8fhodsa9a2r@4ax.com>

By your "logic", since ghosts can be seen, therefore they are not considered
paranormal by you.

Ghosts don't show up on radar. Have you seen a ghost ?

Well for one thing, you snipped the definition for paranormal, so let me restore
your dishonest snip...

It was an honest snip, stooge boy.

  "beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation"

Since they can be seen, and many appear on radar, that is not beyond 
the range of normal experience. Plus there are many scientific
explanations given for UFO's, swamp gas, Venus, plasma, ect, ect
so you are dead wrong labeling  UFO's as paranormal, but what can one
expect from a stooge ?