Subject: Re: WHO TAKES "Pete Charest" SERIOUSLY?
From: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date: 25/10/2004, 04:20
Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo,alt.alien

"The_Sage" <a.b@c.com> wrote in message
news:9hnon059jj43skvjl0tassrj9e7k99vfj6@4ax.com...
Reply to article by: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date written: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:25:47 -0400
MsgID:<nqmdnYUpcJ_7g-HcRVn-pA@centurytel.net>

The whole scientific comminity defines ghosts and UFOs are paranormal.
You are
the only retard who thinks otherwise.

Liar, ask James Oberg if he thinks UFO's are paranormal.

And so James Oberg is "the whole scientific community" now? Wrong again!
Not
even close! An exception to the rule is not the rule.

In the scientific method an exception to a rule negates the rule.

You didn't cite the scientific method in anything you've said yet.

why I just did above there, show me a rule in science that an exception
proves , if there is an exception then the rule must be altered to fit the
new or misfitting data that is why black body radiation led to quantum
mechanics ect.

the saying "the exception proves the rule" is only a thing to say to
confound ones debater when your argument has been shot out from under you by
a pesky counter example. from the point of view of advancing the debate it
is about one jump ahead of "yo mama" but I quess it beats standing there
with ones mouth open

 > The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================