Subject: Re: WHO TAKES "Pete Charest" SERIOUSLY?
From: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date: 26/10/2004, 05:47
Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo,alt.alien

Ya can always tell when Sagebrush is flustered and his back is up against it
, he starts claiming victory ''for the whole world to see" , he hauls out
the dictionary and tries to twist the definations and words around, changes
the subject so he can quibble on some small point, snips all the questions
he can't answer,  calls everyone with a differant viewpoint names, proclaims
all his opinions are ''facts and logic" ,claims that all science supports
his and only his view, sad, I been reading these newsgroups over seven years
and he constantly goes over and over the same ground, every so often some
one plays with him or he sucks in someone new and out come "the pink
elephants'' and the "three little pigs'' hypotheticals and the " I volunteer
for aliens to pick me up" rap, it is so sad he has such a low opinion of his
fellow humans, I  feel sorry for him, but it's his life
"The_Sage" <a.b@c.com> wrote in message
news:64frn014753om8c0jm7ru04chvoqjqs5t5@4ax.com...
Reply to article by: "the Ghost of Pete Charest" <pc@burninhell.com>
Date written: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:52:44 GMT
MsgID:<uprqn0hsi0vljopdgqoh2c5uf7sg09tbpu@4ax.com>

The whole scientific comminity defines ghosts and UFOs are paranormal.
You are
the only retard who thinks otherwise.

Liar, ask James Oberg if he thinks UFO's are paranormal.

And so James Oberg is "the whole scientific community" now? Wrong again!
Not
even close! An exception to the rule is not the rule.

You profoundly stupid moron. You said 'the whole' scientific
community. I did not claim Jim was the whole community ,you liar
By my bringing up Jim it proves you wrong and a liar.

All it proves is you still have no logical thinking abilities. The
dictionary
definition clearly fits the description for the UFO phenomenon and ghosts,
hence
why the scientific community, not as a part but as a whole, consider it
paranormal. Citing a name with no reason behind his or your "logic" for
not
considering it paranormal proves nothing but your ignorance.

I can name others in the scientific field that share Jim's view.

I'm not interested in more opinion, just facts and logic. Too bad you
can't
demonstrate either one.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================