Subject: Re: WHO TAKES "Pete Charest" SERIOUSLY?
From: The_Sage
Date: 27/10/2004, 02:52
Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo,alt.alien

Reply to article by: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date written: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:10:12 -0400
MsgID:<YImdnRLBh7QyU-DcRVn-vw@centurytel.net>

And no matter how much you try to twist words and argue over stupid things like
what is normal, the fact still is that the dictionary clearly defines anything
that is "beyond the range of scientific explanation" as paranormal. That makes
UFOs and ghosts paranormal. Let see you try to wiggle and lie and rant and rave
you way out of that in-your-face fact, just like you always try to do.

You are assuming that Ufos and ghosts are beyond the range of scientific
explanation

I'm not assuming anything, UFOs and ghosts are beyond scientific explanation,
hence the reason science cannot explain them.

I don't accept anything is beyond the range of scientific
explanation , as I don't consider science a finished product

Someday in the future ghosts and UFOs will have a scientific explanation, but
until then, they will just have to be lumped in with all the other things that
are currently unexplainable, ie -- the paranormal.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================