Subject: Re: WHO TAKES "Pete Charest" SERIOUSLY?
From: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date: 27/10/2004, 05:23
Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo,alt.alien

"The_Sage" <a.b@c.com> wrote in message
news:7kvtn0p8fo68mjtv3pfeks4lil97o4lcbg@4ax.com...
Reply to article by: "rick nielsen" <rnielsen@centurytel.net>
Date written: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:10:12 -0400
MsgID:<YImdnRLBh7QyU-DcRVn-vw@centurytel.net>

And no matter how much you try to twist words and argue over stupid
things like
what is normal, the fact still is that the dictionary clearly defines
anything
that is "beyond the range of scientific explanation" as paranormal. That
makes
UFOs and ghosts paranormal. Let see you try to wiggle and lie and rant
and rave
you way out of that in-your-face fact, just like you always try to do.

You are assuming that Ufos and ghosts are beyond the range of scientific
explanation

I'm not assuming anything, UFOs and ghosts are beyond scientific
explanation,
hence the reason science cannot explain them.

I don't accept anything is beyond the range of scientific
explanation , as I don't consider science a finished product

Someday in the future ghosts and UFOs will have a scientific explanation,
but
until then, they will just have to be lumped in with all the other things
that
are currently unexplainable, ie -- the paranormal.

The Sage

that shows better than I can how useless the label "paranormal" is, and how
labels are just artificial classifications

btw since science at present cannot explain how gravity actually works does
that make gravity ''paranormal''?
=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================