On 31 Oct 2004 06:24:14 -0800, tlack@hotmail.com (studio) wrote:

The only thing "unexplainable" implies is that there was insufficient data to
explain anything. With more data, it could be explained.

That seems to be *the problem* both sides of the debate have isn't it?

No not at all.  Both sides of the 'debate' have an extraterrestrial saucer
at Groom Lake.