On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 07:06:05 GMT, "CM" <cm@cm.not.really> wrote:

First, humans did not evolve from 
currently existing monkeys, but humans and monkeys both evolved from a 
common ancestor.

There's no evidence for that, archaeologically or otherwise.  None.

<snip>

Second, there is no reason for one species to vanish simply because another 
species arrived, unless they were driven to extinction. 

Why isn't Neanderthal man still here?

<snip>

Third, those prehistoric "monkeys" did "evolve", that's why there are many 
different species of primates in the world.

The DNA evidence does not support your claims.  The only two primates who
have the nearly identical DNA are chimpanzees and humans.

All life in the Universe is related to each other.

I'm not sure which is more dismaying about that statement:
That there is currently no evidence to support or deny it,
or the fact that it completely contradicts her own creationist statements!

Sounds like you're trying to defend Darwin with religious zealotry.

I don't think creationism or Darwin explain why human beings exist.
And in fact all of the scientific evidence also indicate that both
Creationists and Darwin are wrong.