Reply to article by: Free Speech <yyyiiinnnggg@yahoo.com>
Date written: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:35:37 GMT
MsgID:<7jfao05kfpiqb9993sb2vim0tj2r49fe94@4ax.com>

The only thing "unexplainable" implies is that there was insufficient data to
explain anything. With more data, it could be explained.

That seems to be *the problem* both sides of the debate have isn't it?

No not at all.  Both sides of the 'debate' have an extraterrestrial saucer
at Groom Lake.

That isn't an example of data, that is an example of an urban myth.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================