On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:06:46 -0700, The_Sage <specialoffers@CityBend.com>
wrote:

Reply to article by: Free Speech <yyyiiinnnggg@yahoo.com>
Date written: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:35:37 GMT
MsgID:<7jfao05kfpiqb9993sb2vim0tj2r49fe94@4ax.com>

The only thing "unexplainable" implies is that there was insufficient data to
explain anything. With more data, it could be explained.

That seems to be *the problem* both sides of the debate have isn't it?

No not at all.  Both sides of the 'debate' have an extraterrestrial saucer
at Groom Lake.

That isn't an example of data, that is an example of an urban myth.

Sorry, you're wrong on both counts.  The extraterrestrial saucer is in and
of itself 'data' -- it can be weighed, measured, recorded etc etc.

And the folks who brought us 911 would have us believe it's urban myth, when
in fact that's how they've covered up wide spread acceptance of the fact.

But, 85% of the American public already think the US government is hiding
the truth from them, so convincing them to use their power to open the doors
at Groom Lake so they can see the saucer for themselves won't take much!

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================