Reply to article by: Free Speech <yyyiiinnnggg@yahoo.com>
Date written: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 01:57:45 GMT
MsgID:<eq5bo099qi2tjs004qckoauqadi769k6ug@4ax.com>

The only thing "unexplainable" implies is that there was insufficient data to
explain anything. With more data, it could be explained.

That seems to be *the problem* both sides of the debate have isn't it?

No not at all.  Both sides of the 'debate' have an extraterrestrial saucer
at Groom Lake.

That isn't an example of data, that is an example of an urban myth.

Sorry, you're wrong on both counts.  The extraterrestrial saucer is in and
of itself 'data' -- it can be weighed, measured, recorded etc etc.

You are confusing a report of a saucer at Groom Lake with actual proof that a
saucer exists at Groom Lake. Until someone can demonstrate more than a storytale
of a saucer at Groom Lake, it will remain yet another urban myth.

And the folks who brought us 911 would have us believe it's urban myth, when
in fact that's how they've covered up wide spread acceptance of the fact.

911 does not prove there is a cover up at Groom Lake.

But, 85% of the American public already think the US government is hiding
the truth from them, so convincing them to use their power to open the doors
at Groom Lake so they can see the saucer for themselves won't take much!

So what's taking so long then? Show me the saucer at Groom Lake, the one you
have never seen for yourself, the one you have one you have only heard
storytales about, yet somehow you magically "know for a fact" that it exists.

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The men that American people admire most extravagantly are
most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are
those who try to tell them the truth" -- H. L. Mencken
=============================================================