"Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<LNGdnWremoKLSRjcRVn-iQ@comcast.com>...

"studio" <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fac3168.0410310424.7951576a@posting.google.com...

"Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:<G4KdndNK2dxMo-HcRVn-2Q@comcast.com>...

"studio" <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fac3168.0410241209.4a18c8a9@posting.google.com...

My mistake, of course you are 100% correct.
My point was that a ET-UFO would/could most likely perform in ways we
are not familiar with.

 If you've idenified it as extraterrestrial, it's no longer a 'UFO' and
what makes you think it likely that could perform in ways we are
not familiar with if we're not familiar with them?

I'll amend the ET-UFO to ET-IFO, but, you answered your own question.

 I asked, "What makes _you_ think it likely that (it) could perform in ways 
we
               are not familiar with if, as you say, we're not familiar with 
them?

 How could I possibly know what you're thinking if you don't tell me?

Well, if the UFO/IFO were in the shape of a round ball, a Immelman
roll i.e. wouldn't look quite the same to someone viewing it from a
distance.
The Immelman roll itself was not a familiar manuver until an aircraft
was capable of doing it and until someone invented it.