Monkey Boy <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:

On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:39:37 GMT, "Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL>
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
<ZPWtd.130629$T02.80988@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>:

"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message 
news:061220042209567016%art_deco@127.0.0.1...

Wally AngleseaT <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

On 6 Dec 2004 11:25:36 -0800, "Pietro Sommavilla"
<judoka_61@hotmail.com> wrote:

Wally Anglesea wrote:
<SNIP o kookrant>

Hey, moron, you forgot me!

[projection noted]

How's them "original" polaroids coming, you blabbering buffoon?

[diversion noted]

Are you poor, coward babbling again:
"polaroids can be alterate before they are scanned in."?
[again]

Yes, you illiterate buffoon.


<SNIP o' kookrant>>

No one kookrants like Pietro de Stupido, no one.

Does PeeTee believe in jackalopes?  I can find him
"unalterated" photos as evidence!

ESL!

Ah, but have they been "analised instrumentally"??

I'm sure the AUTHORTIES will CONFISKATE them to prevent SCIENTISTS to
ANALIZE INSTRUMENTALLY.

--