| Subject: Re: debunkers: same old white wash dance |
| From: "Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> |
| Date: 19/12/2004, 22:19 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranormal,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:42:51 -0600, Ross wrote:
Pietro Sommavilla pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
scribbled this in news:1103465545.873956.113820
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:25:22 -0800, Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
H. Bosch wrote:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
Dr. Flonkenstein <admin@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
Feb. 11 1949 Project Grudge Censorship The order was to put all the
Scientist or witness of extraterrestrials presence in categories such:
mad, Paranoiac, Ignorant, Drunk, Dreamer, ect.
Vous etes sur de votre "English"?
There is no extraterrestrial PHENOMENON. H.
Nope, I guess there are just 10.000 weather ballons and instant
pictures PHENOMENON cases around the world.
There may be 10,000 baloons, pictures of non-description
lights
etc.
but there is only the pizio effect as any phenomenon. See
the
Hessdalen Project.
www.hiof.no/crulp/prosjekter/hessdalen or
www.acemake.com/pauldevereux/earthlights.html
This probably explains most photos of lights that are
otherwise
unknowns.
H.
..yeah ..°
..connaissez-vous le BBC ?
Je vous conseille d'aller visiter leur site:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1322432.stm
Question of the day: is Pietro as incoherent in French as >>
he
his
in
English?
..vous n'avez pas répondu.
(Je constate qu'une fois de plus vous déviez du sujet..)
On va essayer.
Si vous n'avez rien de plus sèrieux à exprimer, c'est désolant.
Néanmoins, c'est hilarant
hilarant ?
de se foutre de la guelle d'un imbécile comme vous.
Vous connaisez trés bien ma résponse.
(bis répétita)
Vous n'avez pas répondu.
So what's your point?
Vous n'avez pas le courage d'aller lire la page indiqué.
My point is that you don't answer questions, you just avoid them
because you support the status quo.
No le veo la lògica a tu argumento, porque si el estilo es la excusa
para no responder la pregunta.
see ya later..
Is it possible to write a more incoherent post than this?
Indeed, the guy dozn't seem to have a point of view.
Except from some tampered "Polaroids" published on the internet.