| Subject: Re: UFO Propulsion - Energy Field |
| From: John Griffin |
| Date: 01/01/2005, 17:35 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo |
"altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com> wrote:
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
"researcher" <crbjlrnld@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ no, he didn't write that bullshit -- it's blatant plagiarism ]
[ from http://www.bvalphaserver.com/article11519.html ]
A Scientific Explanation Of The UFO Mystery
Starting with the facts about UFOs as they are observed, there are
good scientific reasons to believe that the energy field associated
with UFOs is psychotronic energy.
Correction: There are emotional reasons for swallowing that shit.
"Emotional" - why emotional? Don't you mean psychological?
You can add psychological and even psychopathological if you like, but
no, I mean emotional, respecting the fact that nutcases love their
delusions, superstitions, etc. Also, there could be psychosexual reasons
(taking the liberty of reinterpreting that word as "mindfucked.")
... This energy form can account
for all of the effects that UFOs have been observed to produce.
Hallucination can do a better accounting. Funny that..."psychotronic
energy" is a hallucination.
John, you are so frantic in your eagerness to debunk this article
you are failing to find the right adjectives. Calm down; the author
might well have invented a silly theory but a "hallucination" it is
not.
<snicker> "Calm down," he squeals...
I said "Psychotronic energy is hallucination." Of course it could be just
a vivid dream, drugs, religious ecstasy, etc., but that doesn't matter.
You thought I said "The theory of Psychotronic energy is hallucination."
Weird. The theory is just another fiction. There are people who could
actually lecture on it with a straight face.
I read through this article (whoever wrote it) - well as much as I
had patience for - and I believe it was mostly pseudo-science.
But having said that there is a grain of truth in there which IMO
supports the argument for forces, physical or psychic, required
to explain the (ostensible) observed movments of ufos. More
importantly to explain ETs' (if that is what they are) journeys
across lighyears.
The author may be wrong but at least he is making an effort
and for that he should be respected.
He said there's evidence to support the "psychotronic energy" conjecture.
If he wants respect, he should say something else.
When one human says he knows his psychotronic energy when he sees it and
another human says that it might be what the aliens use to flit around
the universe, that brings up a mighty sobering thought: There's
intelligent life on one other planet in the universe, and they're just
more humans! (Only the aliens are on the same wavelength, out of millions
of life forms we know about, so they must be just like us.) What a
letdown. Damn, as long as there are science fiction writers, we'll have
steady supply of better ideas than "psychotronic energy."