| Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic |
| From: "Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> |
| Date: 03/01/2005, 22:14 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:10:28 +0100, D.E. wrote:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> schreef in bericht
news:pan.2005.01.03.20.52.12.240777@localhost.localdomain...
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:09:02 +0100, D.E. wrote:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> schreef in bericht
news:pan.2005.01.02.19.35.10.94223@localhost.localdomain...
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:20:41 +0100, D.E. wrote:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> schreef in bericht
news:pan.2005.01.02.07.25.31.170345@localhost.localdomain...
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:13:18 +0000, researcher wrote:
A Definition of "UFO Skeptic"
Someone that is fundamentally in denial and has a mind closed like a
steel
trap.
Alternate definition:
Someone that is being used by the Government or other special
interest
group
to deliberately lie about UFOs or make up fake UFO stories to help
cover
up
the truth.
Any Comments on this?
Why would anybody want to cover up the fact that there are no aliens?
because there is no fact that supports your notion?
I think the fact that my cat can fly is enough to support my notion.
Tss flying cats are a dime a dozen here, no notion how frequent they
are over there ;o)
Many people know about flying cats, but the government doesn't want it to
become a publicly known fact.
Darn, now I can expect a visit from the men in red (also known
as "firemen", but we know better that it is a front for the secret
flying cat squad.) ;o)
I don't know why there is a government consiracy against flying cats, but
it has to do with remote neural control.