Subject: Re: UFO Propulsion - Energy Field
From: "altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com>
Date: 03/01/2005, 13:50
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo

"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
altheim wrote:
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
"researcher" <crbjlrnld@yahoo.com> wrote:

[  no, he didn't write that bullshit -- it's blatant plagiarism ]
[  from http://www.bvalphaserver.com/article11519.html ]

A Scientific Explanation Of The UFO Mystery
Starting with the facts about UFOs as they are observed, there are
good scientific reasons to believe that the energy field associated
with UFOs is psychotronic energy.

Correction: There are emotional reasons for swallowing that shit.

"Emotional" - why emotional? Don't you mean psychological?

... This energy form can account
for all of the effects that UFOs have been observed to produce.

Hallucination can do a better accounting.  Funny that..."psychotronic
energy" is a hallucination.


John, you are so frantic in your eagerness to debunk this article
you are failing to find the right adjectives. Calm down; the author
might well have invented a silly theory but a "hallucination" it is
not.

Well, let's say it's pseudoscientifical fiction then.

If you must...

I read through this article (whoever wrote it) - well as much as I
had patience for - and I believe it was mostly pseudo-science.
But having said that there is a grain of truth in there which IMO
supports the argument for forces, physical or psychic,

psychic "forces" or "energy" have nothing whatsoever to do with their
physical counterparts. Their correlation are about as much the same like
logic and wishful thinking.

required
to explain the (ostensible) observed movments of ufos. More
importantly to explain ETs' (if that is what they are) journeys
across lighyears.

Why explain something that doesn't exist?

Come on Doc, play the game... in apu ufos *do* exist.

In any case it is a reasonable intellectual excercise to think up
ways in which ET ufos might get around the problem of covering
vast stretches of space within their own lifetimes - without invoking
physically impossible FTL machines.

The author may be wrong but at least he is making an effort
and for that he should be respected.

What is despicable about crackpots is that they use terms they picked up
from different, unrelated disciplines and weave a whole theory about it.

So what? I think they call it "poetic licence".

They think everybody is as uneducated in these fields as themselves and
are only surrended by people with a lower education than them.

Careful Doc - that is an early sign of paranoia...

or an inferiority complex.

--
altheim