| Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic |
| From: "altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com> |
| Date: 04/01/2005, 13:43 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
altheim wrote:
"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
[snips]
Well your problem is that we (TINW) are all debunkers here, as well as
being skeptics. You can think of a debunker as a skeptic with attitude
and no fear of calling a fraud a fraud or a nut a nut. We don't suffer
>from the misguided sense of political correctness and outright credulity
that allows people like you to give the benefit of the doubt to every
babbling loony who wanders in here. You may not like our attitudes and
how we express them, but whining about how we say what we say doesn't
make what we are saying any less valid. HTH.
In a way, this is quite reassuring for now, by your admission, we know
you have no real interest in the subject matter and we can safely ignore
you.
Translation: You are in denial. You are just going to ignore and
deny reality because you don't like the tone in which it is
explained to you. Hey, isn't denial what you were just raging
against the skeptics about? Hypocrite much?
Hypocrite?? You should talk. You admit that you have no interest
in the subject matter of the paranormal and ufo groups and that
you are here solely as debunkers and you call *me* a hypocrite?
No, I don't think of you as a "skeptic with attitude"; it is a blatent
conceit to award yourself such an accolade, you are nothing
but a Troll.
What are your other targets - caravanners, fox hunters, colitis
support groups perhaps?
--
altheim