| Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic |
| From: .DrPostman <.Looky@mysig.foremail> |
| Date: 04/01/2005, 14:09 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:25:37 -0000, "altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com> in
accordance with The Prophecy scribed:
"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Well your problem is that we (TINW) are all debunkers here, as well as
being skeptics. You can think of a debunker as a skeptic with attitude
and no fear of calling a fraud a fraud or a nut a nut. We don't suffer
from the misguided sense of political correctness and outright credulity
that allows people like you to give the benefit of the doubt to every
babbling loony who wanders in here. You may not like our attitudes and
how we express them, but whining about how we say what we say doesn't
make what we are saying any less valid. HTH.
In a way, this is quite reassuring for now, by your admission, we know
you have no real interest in the subject matter and we can safely ignore
you.
What you may have heard was the sound of a clue going at light speed
over your head. That is the best way of putting the skeptic point of
view I have ever seen. That you come back with this shows how
vacuous and petty your views are.
--
DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® #15-51506-253.
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Nothing compares to the complicated futility of ignorance."
-Kurt Vonnegut