Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic
From: "altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com>
Date: 05/01/2005, 10:04
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors

"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
researcher wrote:
Michael Davis wrote:
altheim wrote:


This isn't a debating forum. This is Usenet. It is an entertainment
forum. I find debunking UFO kooks to be entertaining. HTH.


Can't speak for yourself, eh, kook?

Hang on - who are you adressing here? I didn't write that - you did.

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance!"
--Albert Einstein

Non sequitur. You have suggested nothing that can be investigated.

But he has.

"There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
returns of conjecture out of such trifling investments of fact."
--Mark Twain

Non sequitur. You aren't posting science. You are posting fairytales.

To you perhaps. To me it is conjecture.

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is
proof
against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting
ignorance--that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
--Herbert Spencer

Non sequitur. You have not actually investigated anything.

But it *is* relevant: you are showing contempt.

--
altheim